Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-secdir-early-montville-2017-08-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08
Requested revision 08 (document currently at 25)
Type Early Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-08-29
Requested 2017-08-15
Requested by Joe Clarke
Authors Eliot Lear , Ralph Droms , Dan Romascanu
I-D last updated 2017-08-27
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -08 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Early review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -08 by Henk Birkholz (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -08 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Adrian Farrel (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -20 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -20 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Comments
The opsawg working group feels this document is generally in good shape, and the work has been progressing nicely.  The document is very readable, and it would benefit from an early review especially around areas of security and IoT.  By MUD's very nature, it relies on trust and needs to be friendly to constrained, purpose-built devices.

The YANG modules defined within have been previously reviewed, but could use a new set of YANG Doctor eyes.  In particular, comments have been raised about what leafs should be mandatory (if any).

Thank you.
Assignment Reviewer Adam W. Montville
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 25)
Result Has issues
Completed 2017-08-27
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-secdir-early-montville-2017-08-27-00
Error; cannot read
(/assets/ietfdata/doc/review/review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-secdir-early-montville-2017-08-27.txt)