Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-genart-early-sparks-2017-08-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-08 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | 08 (document currently at 25) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2017-08-29 | |
| Requested | 2017-08-15 | |
| Requested by | Joe Clarke | |
| Authors | Eliot Lear, Ralph Droms, Dan Romascanu | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-08-30 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -08 by Adam Montville
(diff)
Genart Early review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff) Iotdir Early review of -08 by Henk Birkholz (diff) Yangdoctors Early review of -08 by Martin Björklund (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Adrian Farrel (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Adam Montville (diff) Genart Telechat review of -20 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -20 by Scott Bradner (diff) |
|
| Comments | The opsawg working group feels this document is generally in good shape, and the work has been progressing nicely. The document is very readable, and it would benefit from an early review especially around areas of security and IoT. By MUD's very nature, it relies on trust and needs to be friendly to constrained, purpose-built devices. The YANG modules defined within have been previously reviewed, but could use a new set of YANG Doctor eyes. In particular, comments have been raised about what leafs should be mandatory (if any). Thank you. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-genart-early-sparks-2017-08-30 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 08 (document currently at 25) | |
| Review result | Almost Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2017-08-30 |
Review
review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-genart-early-sparks-2017-08-30
Error; cannot read (/a/ietfdata/doc/review/review-ietf-opsawg-mud-08-genart-early-sparks-2017-08-30.txt)