IESG agenda: 2019-09-19

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die
Best Current Practice
Deprecating RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH)
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees
Proposed Standard
Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig
Proposed Standard
Use of the HSS/LMS Hash-based Signature Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Token
Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth
Proposed Standard
PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Cisco's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

IETF stream
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis
Proposed Standard
Restart Signaling for IS-IS
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection
Proposed Standard
PCEP Extensions for Associating Working and Protection LSPs with Stateful PCE
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pim-reserved-bits
Proposed Standard
PIM Message Type Space Extension and Reserved Bits
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-cbor-sequence
Proposed Standard
Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Sequences
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-klensin-idna-unicode-review
Proposed Standard
IDNA Review for New Unicode Versions
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis
Proposed Standard
Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

IETF stream
status-change-ssh-arcfour-to-historic
None
Moving RFC 4345 (arcfour modes for SSH) to Historic
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (IETF area)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption
Informational
Issues and Requirements for SNI Encryption in TLS
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce
Informational
Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE).
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-ise-iana-policy
IETF conflict review for draft-ise-iana-policy
ISE Informational
draft-ise-iana-policy
How Requests for IANA Action Will be Handled on the Independent Stream
Token
Alissa Cooper

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance (avtcore)
Charter
charter-ietf-avtcore-(02-00)
Area
ART (Barry Leiba)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)