IESG agenda: 2020-04-09
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
(Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert
- Proposed Standard
- PASSporT Extension for Diverted Calls
- Token
- Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue
- Best Current Practice
- A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel
- Proposed Standard
- T.140 Real-time Text Conversation over WebRTC Data Channels
- Token
- Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow
- Proposed Standard
- Registry Data Escrow Specification
- Token
- Barry Leiba (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud
- Proposed Standard
- Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery for Datagram Transports
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress
- Proposed Standard
- BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-hip-dex
- Proposed Standard
- HIP Diet EXchange (DEX)
- Token
- Éric Vyncke (INT area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
(None)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-taps-transport-security
- Informational
- A Survey of the Interaction Between Security Protocols and Transport Services
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis
- Informational
- DNS Privacy Considerations
- Token
- Éric Vyncke (INT area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis
- Informational
- Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3GPP Mobile Network Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA')
- Token
- Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
- Informational
- Multi Signer DNSSEC models
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-sidrops-rp
- Informational
- Requirements for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Relying Parties
- Token
- Warren Kumari (OPS area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo
- Informational
- The secret-token URI Scheme
- Token
- Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
3.2.2 Returning items
(None)
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
(None)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4.3 For action
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol
IETF conflict review for draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol - ISE Informational
-
draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol
Dynamic Service Negotiation - Token
- Alissa Cooper
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-msahli-ise-ieee1609
IETF conflict review for draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609 - ISE Experimental
-
draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609
TLS Authentication using ITS certificate - Token
- Benjamin Kaduk
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
(None)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
- WG name
- Deterministic Networking (detnet)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-detnet-(01-00)
- Area
- RTG (Deborah Brungard)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
- WG name
- Transport Layer Security (tls)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-tls-(05-03)
- Area
- SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)