IESG agenda: 2021-01-21

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate
Best Current Practice
Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd
Proposed Standard
Operational Aspects of Proxy-ARP/ND in EVPN Networks
Token
Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
Proposed Standard
Special Purpose Label terminology
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-core-dev-urn
Proposed Standard
Uniform Resource Names for Device Identifiers
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang
Proposed Standard
YANG Data Model for Segment Routing
Token
Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-quic-http
Proposed Standard
Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3 (HTTP/3)
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-quic-qpack
Proposed Standard
QPACK: Header Compression for HTTP/3
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Proposed Standard
Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) extension for associating Policies and Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-cose-x509
Proposed Standard
CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates
Token
Barry Leiba (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

IETF stream
status-change-tls-oldversions-to-historic
None
Moving TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1, and DTLSv1.0 to Historic
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (IETF area)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip
Informational
Path Computation Element (PCE) based Traffic Engineering (TE) in Native IP Networks
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
China Telecom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-foudil-securitytxt
Informational
A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

3.2.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis (Has RFC Editor Note)
Informational
Zstandard Compression and the application/zstd Media Type
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
Last call expires
2021-01-19

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

IETF stream
status-change-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic
None
Moving single-DES and IDEA TLS ciphersuites to Historic
Token
Benjamin Kaduk (IETF area)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do
IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do
IRTF Informational
draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do
Path Aware Networking: Obstacles to Deployment (A Bestiary of Roads Not Taken)
Token
Alissa Cooper

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

WG name
WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS (wish)
Charter
charter-ietf-wish-(00-01)
Area
ART (Murray Kucherawy)

WG name
IOT Operations (iotops)
Charter
charter-ietf-iotops-(00-09)
Area
OPS (Warren Kumari)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace)
Charter
charter-ietf-ace-(01-00)
Area
SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #1186621] Designated experts for RFC 8819 (IANA)

6.2 [IANA #1186792] Renewing early allocations for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates (IANA)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)