IESG agenda: 2021-01-21
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll call
1.2 Bash the agenda
1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats
1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat
(Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
2. Protocol actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG submissions
2.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate
- Best Current Practice
- Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd
- Proposed Standard
- Operational Aspects of Proxy-ARP/ND in EVPN Networks
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
- Proposed Standard
- Special Purpose Label terminology
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-core-dev-urn
- Proposed Standard
- Uniform Resource Names for Device Identifiers
- Token
- Barry Leiba (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang
- Proposed Standard
- YANG Data Model for Segment Routing
- Token
- Martin Vigoureux (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-quic-http
- Proposed Standard
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 3 (HTTP/3)
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-quic-qpack
- Proposed Standard
- QPACK: Header Compression for HTTP/3
- Token
- Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
- Proposed Standard
- Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) extension for associating Policies and Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.1.2 Returning items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-cose-x509
- Proposed Standard
- CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Header parameters for carrying and referencing X.509 certificates
- Token
- Barry Leiba (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
2.2 Individual submissions
2.2.1 New items
(None)
2.2.2 Returning items
(None)
2.3 Status changes
2.3.1 New items
- IETF stream
- status-change-tls-oldversions-to-historic
- None
- Moving TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1, and DTLSv1.0 to Historic
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (IETF area)
2.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3. Document actions
3.1 WG submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip
- Informational
- Path Computation Element (PCE) based Traffic Engineering (TE) in Native IP Networks
- Token
- Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - No Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- IPR
-
China Telecom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip
3.1.2 Returning items
(None)
3.2 Individual submissions via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New items
- IETF stream
- draft-foudil-securitytxt
- Informational
- A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (SEC area)
- IANA review
- IANA OK - Actions Needed
- Consensus
- Unknown
- Reviews
3.2.2 Returning items
- IETF stream
- draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis (Has RFC Editor Note)
- Informational
- Zstandard Compression and the application/zstd Media Type
- Token
- Barry Leiba (ART area)
- IANA review
- Version Changed - Review Needed
- Consensus
- Yes
- Reviews
- Last call expires
- 2021-01-19
3.3 Status changes
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"
3.3.1 New items
- IETF stream
- status-change-tls-des-idea-ciphers-to-historic
- None
- Moving single-DES and IDEA TLS ciphersuites to Historic
- Token
- Benjamin Kaduk (IETF area)
3.3.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:
- The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
- The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
- The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
- The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
- The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.4.1 New items
(None)
3.4.2 Returning items
(None)
3.4.3 For action
- Conflict review
-
conflict-review-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do
IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do - IRTF Informational
-
draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do
Path Aware Networking: Obstacles to Deployment (A Bestiary of Roads Not Taken) - Token
- Alissa Cooper
4. Working Group actions
4.1 WG creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review
- WG name
- WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS (wish)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-wish-(00-01)
- Area
- ART (Murray Kucherawy)
- WG name
- IOT Operations (iotops)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-iotops-(00-09)
- Area
- OPS (Warren Kumari)
4.1.2 Proposed for approval
(None)
4.2 WG rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review
- WG name
- Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace)
- Charter
- charter-ietf-ace-(01-00)
- Area
- SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)
4.2.2 Proposed for approval
(None)