IESG agenda: 2020-04-09

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-stir-passport-divert
Proposed Standard
PASSporT Extension for Diverted Calls
Token
Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue
Best Current Practice
A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel
Proposed Standard
T.140 Real-time Text Conversation over WebRTC Data Channels
Token
Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow
Proposed Standard
Registry Data Escrow Specification
Token
Barry Leiba (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud
Proposed Standard
Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery for Datagram Transports
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress
Proposed Standard
BGP RPKI-Based Origin Validation on Export
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-hip-dex
Proposed Standard
HIP Diet EXchange (DEX)
Token
Éric Vyncke (INT area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-taps-transport-security
Informational
A Survey of the Interaction Between Security Protocols and Transport Services
Token
Magnus Westerlund (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis
Informational
DNS Privacy Considerations
Token
Éric Vyncke (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-emu-rfc5448bis
Informational
Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3GPP Mobile Network Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA')
Token
Roman Danyliw (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
Informational
Multi Signer DNSSEC models
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-sidrops-rp
Informational
Requirements for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Relying Parties
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo
Informational
The secret-token URI Scheme
Token
Murray Kucherawy (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol
IETF conflict review for draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol
ISE Informational
draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol
Dynamic Service Negotiation
Token
Alissa Cooper

Conflict review
conflict-review-msahli-ise-ieee1609
IETF conflict review for draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609
ISE Experimental
draft-msahli-ise-ieee1609
TLS Authentication using ITS certificate
Token
Benjamin Kaduk

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
Deterministic Networking (detnet)
Charter
charter-ietf-detnet-(01-00)
Area
RTG (Deborah Brungard)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
Transport Layer Security (tls)
Charter
charter-ietf-tls-(05-03)
Area
SEC (Benjamin Kaduk)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #1165827] Management Item: Acceptance of media type registration from standards organization FIX Trading Community (IANA)

6.2 Response to [IANA #1161777] Protocol Number for Transparent Inter Process Communication (TIPC) (Respones to IANA)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)