Last Call Review of draft-shin-augmented-pake-
review-shin-augmented-pake-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-01-27-00

Request Review of draft-shin-augmented-pake
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-02-10
Requested 2011-05-19
Authors SeongHan Shin, Kazukuni Kobara
Draft last updated 2012-01-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Vijay Gurbani
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Vijay Gurbani
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou
State Completed
Review review-shin-augmented-pake-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-01-27
Review completed: 2012-01-27

Review
review-shin-augmented-pake-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-01-27

Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I found some editorial glitches and the use of "temporal" when "temporary" was intended, but someone else can catch those.

Reference K11 is now RFC 6467. That means the Notify message type and the GSPM payload type have now been assigned (16424 and 49 respectively) and can be inserted into the document where it currently says "TBD".

The request to IANA names the wrong registry. The correct name is "IKEv2 Secure Password Methods" registry, established by RFC 6467.

The relationship between this document and RFC 6467 is odd. In the ordinary course of events this document would have a normative dependency on RFC 6467. It is obvious that the latter was written after the present document, and avoidance of the dependency was deliberate on both sides. Still, the authors of this document might reconsider, even though RFC 6467 would be a down-reference since it is Informational.


Tina