Telechat Review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04
review-kivinen-802-15-ie-04-genart-telechat-dupont-2017-02-15-00

Request Review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-02-14
Requested 2017-01-23
Draft last updated 2017-02-15
Completed reviews Intdir Early review of -02 by Charles Perkins (diff)
Intdir Early review of -02 by Pascal Thubert (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -04 by Scott Bradner (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -04 by Magnus Nystrom (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -06 by Scott Bradner
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-kivinen-802-15-ie-04-genart-telechat-dupont-2017-02-15
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-02-15

Review
review-kivinen-802-15-ie-04-genart-telechat-dupont-2017-02-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20170210
IETF LC End Date: 20170214
IESG Telechat date: 20170224

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
 - ToC page 1 and 3 page 3 (title): Benefitting -> Benefiting

 - 3 page 3 (suggest):  CoRE etc, ->  CoRE, etc,

 - 4 page 3: reading the document I had a question about the "no need
  ... to specify the internal structure" but the reason became clear
  the next page. So I have no concern about this.

Regards 

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr