Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13-secdir-lc-takahashi-2016-05-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-05-31
Requested 2016-05-19
Authors Lars Eggert, Gorry Fairhurst, Greg Shepherd
Draft last updated 2016-05-31
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -13 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -18 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -17 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Tim Chown (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Takeshi Takahashi
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13-secdir-lc-takahashi-2016-05-31
Reviewed rev. 13 (document currently at 19)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-05-31

Review
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13-secdir-lc-takahashi-2016-05-31

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
other last call comments.

[General summary]

This document is ready.

[Topic of this draft]

This draft talks about the UDP Usage Guidelines and replaces RFC 5405 (BCP).
It talks about how to use UDP, especially it pays attention to the fair use
of the network resourced and talks a lot on congestion control.

The RFC 5045 focuses on unicast case, but this bis document talks about
multicast, (anycast, broadcast, )and IP tunneling cases.

The content is useful, and I hope to see this draft to be published as an
RFC.

[Clarification question]

In Table 1 "Summary of recommendations", I wonder if the corresponding
section numbers are correct.

[Now]
"SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1
and 
"SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to
Section 5.2

[New]
"SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1.1
and 
"SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to
Section 5.1.2

I might be wrong, so please check.

Also I have seen several typos (especially, missing parentheses around
referenced section numbers) on this document, so please revise the texts
before the publication of this document.

Thank you.
Take