Telechat Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08-secdir-telechat-takahashi-2017-06-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-06-06
Requested 2017-05-09
Authors Jared Mauch, Job Snijders, Greg Hankins
Draft last updated 2017-06-08
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Carlos Martínez (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale Worley (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Russ White (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Takeshi Takahashi
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dale Worley
Assignment Reviewer Takeshi Takahashi 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08-secdir-telechat-takahashi-2017-06-08
Reviewed rev. 08
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-06-08

Review
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08-secdir-telechat-takahashi-2017-06-08

Hello,

I was re-assigned to review this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

[overall feeling on this draft]
ready

[overview of the changes after the 05 draft] Many changes are made.
Especially, this draft updates RFC4271, which anyway was cited in the normative reference section.
Moreover, the "solution" section was removed, (especially, its 4th bullet was completely removed.) I believe the content became more mature.
As mentioned before, I see no problem in this draft.

Thank you.
Take




2017-04-17 12:07 GMT+09:00 Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
> area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like 
> any other last call comments.
>
> [overall feeling on this draft]
> ready
>
> [overview]
> This document defines the default behavior of a BGP speaker when there 
> is no import or export policy associated with an External BGP session.
>
> This document is very concise.
> I do not have any discussion issues.
>
> Thank you.
> Take
>