Last Call Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-04-18
Requested 2017-04-07
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Jared Mauch, Job Snijders, Greg Hankins
Draft last updated 2017-04-10
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Carlos Martínez (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale Worley (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Russ White (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Takeshi Takahashi
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dale Worley (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dale Worley
Comments
If needed, we can extend the review period until the Telechat date (the document is not scheduled yet).
Assignment Reviewer Russ White 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2017-04-10

Review
review-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-04-10

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-04
Reviewer: Russ White
Review Date: 10 April 2017
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

The draft is mercifully short and very readable, clearly noting the requirements on implementations and their consequences.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

No minor issues found.

:-) /r