Telechat Review of draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06
review-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06-opsdir-telechat-jaeggli-2017-10-06-00

Request Review of draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-09-26
Requested 2017-09-13
Authors Michael Bäuerle
Draft last updated 2017-10-06
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel Jaeggli
State Completed
Review review-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06-opsdir-telechat-jaeggli-2017-10-06
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 09)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2017-10-06

Review
review-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock-06-opsdir-telechat-jaeggli-2017-10-06

I have reviewed draft-baeuerle-netnews-cancel-lock on behalf of the Operations Directorate, for the IESG telechat review.

Modula the issues raised in the Genart Review (abnf validation) and security ( pre-image attack protection) I think this is a largely ready to go.

Under the best circumstances methods for article cancelation aren't necessarily honored, are intended to  be employed by  a diverse group of end users injecting netnews agents, or moderators, asserting various roles in managing message removal and offer somewhere between poor to no assurance of efficacy. 

To the extent that this methodology offers an improvement  to the set of parties that chose to both employ it and honor it; it offers protection against spurious removal requests from within the scope of their systems. the protections offered by the MUST NOT in section 3.2 are weak as the message has no integrity protection of substance and any such assurance that demand is honored is a coordination problem between like-minded operators.