The Group Domain of Interpretation
draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11
Yes
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-08-07)
Unknown
The draft says it describes an "updated" version of GDOI. However, the draft seems to obsolete the previous spec, not to update it. In any case, this has already been captured in Adrian's discuss.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-08-09)
Unknown
(1) Shouldn't DES and other algorithms be deprecated more obviously? E.g. 5.3.2.1 doesn't say not to do this. Same question for MD5 in SIG_HASH_MD5 etc. (2) Has anything been learned about authorizing GKCS's since rfc 3547? If so, wouldn't it be good to include something about that, even if it doesn't provide a fool-proof way to authorize a host as a GKCS? (Text like that would go nicely in 3.1 I think.)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown