Skip to main content

Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Fibre Channel
draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2004-04-20
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-04-19
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-04-19
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-04-19
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-04-19
02 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-19
02 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-04-18 from 2004-04-08
2004-04-19
02 Bert Wijnen State Change Notice email list have been change to , from ,
2004-04-19
02 Bert Wijnen New revision (02) addresses some IETF Last Call
comments and also IESG comments/discuss items.
2004-04-16
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-02.txt
2004-04-16
02 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15
2004-04-15
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-15
02 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-04-15
02 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-04-15
02 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-04-14
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
I couldn't decide whether to make this a blocking comment, hence the record of a
cleared Discuss.  Does this ND actually work?  Section …
[Ballot comment]
I couldn't decide whether to make this a blocking comment, hence the record of a
cleared Discuss.  Does this ND actually work?  Section 9 says the solicited-node
address is mapped to broadcast, so there's a scaling question.  Appendix B
has a discussion related to validating the Neighbor Solicitation information which is
unreadable, because of unexplained acronyms from the FC specs, but which suggests
there are complications.
2004-04-14
02 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-04-14
02 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
This can be fixed with an RFC Editor note.  Do not state that FC carries SCSI directly:

The FC-4
  level supports Upper …
[Ballot discuss]
This can be fixed with an RFC Editor note.  Do not state that FC carries SCSI directly:

The FC-4
  level supports Upper Level Protocols, such as IPv4, IPv6 or SCSI.

The FC-4 level supports Upper Level Protocols, such as IPv4, IPv6 or SCSI (mapped
onto its transport, TCP).
2004-04-14
02 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-04-14
02 David Kessens [Ballot comment]
I received positive comments from Pekka from the ops directorate
regarding this document.
2004-04-14
02 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-04-14
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART.
Some comments about concepts that are not explained, but basic spec is OK.
See http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/ for details.
2004-04-14
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART.
Minor comments only.
2004-04-14
02 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-14
02 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-04-13
02 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-04-13
02 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-04-12
02 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-04-12
02 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.1 does a good job of pointing out that layer 2 and layer 3
  security protocols can be used.  This information …
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.1 does a good job of pointing out that layer 2 and layer 3
  security protocols can be used.  This information should be repeated
  in the security considerations.
  >
  > The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] MAY be used to secure the FC frames
  > composing the FC Sequence. [AH] or [ESP] may be used to provide
  > security at the IPv6 layer. Other types of FC Optional Header MUST
  > NOT be used in an IPv6 FC Sequence.
  >
  It would be nice to expand on this discussion in the security considerations
  section, especially in the area of layer 2 security since [FC-FS] is not as
  easy to obtain as an RFC.
2004-04-12
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-04-12
02 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen No IETF Last Call Comments were received.
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-04-08 from 2004-01-16
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-08
02 Bert Wijnen Created "Approve" ballot
2004-04-02
02 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-03-19
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-03-19
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-03-19
02 Bert Wijnen Last Call was requested by Bert Wijnen
2004-03-19
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-03-19
02 (System) Last call text was added
2004-03-19
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-03-19
02 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-16
02 Bert Wijnen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen
2004-01-16
02 Bert Wijnen State Change Notice email list have been change to , from
2004-01-16
02 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-01-16 from
2004-01-12
02 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2003-12-04
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-01.txt
2003-10-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-00.txt