Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Fibre Channel
draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
02 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin |
2004-04-20
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2004-04-18 from 2004-04-08 |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Change Notice email list have been change to , from , |
2004-04-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | New revision (02) addresses some IETF Last Call comments and also IESG comments/discuss items. |
2004-04-16
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-02.txt |
2004-04-16
|
02 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 |
2004-04-15
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2004-04-15
|
02 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2004-04-15
|
02 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten |
2004-04-15
|
02 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot comment] I couldn't decide whether to make this a blocking comment, hence the record of a cleared Discuss. Does this ND actually work? Section … [Ballot comment] I couldn't decide whether to make this a blocking comment, hence the record of a cleared Discuss. Does this ND actually work? Section 9 says the solicited-node address is mapped to broadcast, so there's a scaling question. Appendix B has a discussion related to validating the Neighbor Solicitation information which is unreadable, because of unexplained acronyms from the FC specs, but which suggests there are complications. |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot discuss] This can be fixed with an RFC Editor note. Do not state that FC carries SCSI directly: The FC-4 level supports Upper … [Ballot discuss] This can be fixed with an RFC Editor note. Do not state that FC carries SCSI directly: The FC-4 level supports Upper Level Protocols, such as IPv4, IPv6 or SCSI. The FC-4 level supports Upper Level Protocols, such as IPv4, IPv6 or SCSI (mapped onto its transport, TCP). |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin |
2004-04-14
|
02 | David Kessens | [Ballot comment] I received positive comments from Pekka from the ops directorate regarding this document. |
2004-04-14
|
02 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART. Some comments about concepts that are not explained, but basic spec is OK. See http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/ for details. |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART. Minor comments only. |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2004-04-14
|
02 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2004-04-13
|
02 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2004-04-13
|
02 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin |
2004-04-12
|
02 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2004-04-12
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Section 4.1 does a good job of pointing out that layer 2 and layer 3 security protocols can be used. This information … [Ballot comment] Section 4.1 does a good job of pointing out that layer 2 and layer 3 security protocols can be used. This information should be repeated in the security considerations. > > The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] MAY be used to secure the FC frames > composing the FC Sequence. [AH] or [ESP] may be used to provide > security at the IPv6 layer. Other types of FC Optional Header MUST > NOT be used in an IPv6 FC Sequence. > It would be nice to expand on this discussion in the security considerations section, especially in the area of layer 2 security since [FC-FS] is not as easy to obtain as an RFC. |
2004-04-12
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2004-04-12
|
02 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | No IETF Last Call Comments were received. |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2004-04-08 from 2004-01-16 |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-15 by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen |
2004-04-08
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Created "Approve" ballot |
2004-04-02
|
02 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2004-03-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2004-03-19
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2004-03-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Last Call was requested by Bert Wijnen |
2004-03-19
|
02 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2004-03-19
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2004-03-19
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2004-03-19
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Bert Wijnen |
2004-01-16
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen |
2004-01-16
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | State Change Notice email list have been change to , from |
2004-01-16
|
02 | Bert Wijnen | Status date has been changed to 2004-01-16 from |
2004-01-12
|
02 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova |
2003-12-04
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-01.txt |
2003-10-21
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-00.txt |