Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Fibre Channel
draft-ietf-imss-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-02
Yes
(Bert Wijnen)
(Margaret Cullen)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Jon Peterson)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-14)
Unknown
I couldn't decide whether to make this a blocking comment, hence the record of a cleared Discuss. Does this ND actually work? Section 9 says the solicited-node address is mapped to broadcast, so there's a scaling question. Appendix B has a discussion related to validating the Neighbor Solicitation information which is unreadable, because of unexplained acronyms from the FC specs, but which suggests there are complications.
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-14)
Unknown
I received positive comments from Pekka from the ops directorate regarding this document.
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-14)
Unknown
Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART. Some comments about concepts that are not explained, but basic spec is OK. See http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/reviews/ for details.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-12)
Unknown
Section 4.1 does a good job of pointing out that layer 2 and layer 3 security protocols can be used. This information should be repeated in the security considerations. > > The FC ESP_Header [FC-FS] MAY be used to secure the FC frames > composing the FC Sequence. [AH] or [ESP] may be used to provide > security at the IPv6 layer. Other types of FC Optional Header MUST > NOT be used in an IPv6 FC Sequence. > It would be nice to expand on this discussion in the security considerations section, especially in the area of layer 2 security since [FC-FS] is not as easy to obtain as an RFC.
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown