Routing Area Working Group
charter-ietf-rtgwg-05

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Alia Atlas) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) (was No Objection) Yes

Comment (2014-10-02 for -04-03)
No email
send info
As a survivor of a few proposals being Dispatched in RAI, I'm glad to see RTG adopting a similar model for proposal evaluation.

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

Comment (2014-09-30 for -04-02)
No email
send info
Fully support this: a good change.

I do not believe this change needs to go for external review.

Nit...
s/an optional venue/a venue/
(There is nothing in "a venue" that implies compulsion)

---

Just noticed something we should add:
RTGWG would be a really good home for routing-related YANG models that are not specifically covered by other RTG working groups, and for generic routing YANG models.
Could this be added as a work item?

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) (was Block) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-02 for -04-04)
No email
send info
Editorial point/

RTGWG may also work on specific small topics that do not fit with an existing
working group. An example of a small topic is a draft that might otherwise be
AD-sponsored but which could benefit from the review and consensus that RTGWG
can provide.

Not sure "small" is the right adjective.
In OPSAWG, we had small topics that became big topics (example: 3 CAPWAP documents, multiple EMAN documents that triggered the EMAN WG creation, IEEE/IETF MIB relationship RFC). I would remove "small", which equates to "non important"

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Barry Leiba) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-01 for -04-02)
No email
send info
I agree with the comment that "optional" should be removed from the first sentence.

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-01 for -04-03)
No email
send info
The updated charter looks good, I support the update.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection