Skip to main content

Routing Area Working Group
charter-ietf-rtgwg-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2023-03-29
05 Amy Vezza Responsible AD changed to Jim Guichard from Alvaro Retana
2021-03-10
05 Cindy Morgan Responsible AD changed to Alvaro Retana from Martin Vigoureux
2018-03-21
05 Amy Vezza Responsible AD changed to Martin Vigoureux from Alia Atlas
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org to (None)
2014-10-03
05 Amy Vezza New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-05.txt
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved from Internal review
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the charter
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza WG action text was changed
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza Added milestone "Submit specification on Advanced IP Fast Reroute mechanism to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard", due April 2013, from current group milestones
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza Added milestone "Submit Composite-Link Framework to IESG for publication as Informational", due November 2012, from current group milestones
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza Added milestone "Submit initial Internet Draft on Multicast IP Fast Reroute Architecture", due November 2012, from current group milestones
2014-10-03
04-04 Amy Vezza Added milestone "Submit Composite-Link Requirements to IESG for publication as Informational", due November 2012, from current group milestones
2014-10-02
04-04 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Block
2014-10-02
04-04 Alia Atlas New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-04.txt
2014-10-02
04-03 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2014-10-02
04-03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot block]
Since Adrian's proposal actually made it to the latest proposed charter, let me file a BLOCK.
> Just noticed something we should add: …
[Ballot block]
Since Adrian's proposal actually made it to the latest proposed charter, let me file a BLOCK.
> Just noticed something we should add:
> RTGWG would be a really good home for routing-related YANG models that
> are not specifically covered by other RTG working groups,
The sentence above is a good addition.
> and for generic
> routing YANG models.
But how is this different than "routing-related YANG models"?
I believe having those two categories adds to the confusion. Maybe because I don't understand the difference.

Once this clarification is done, I support RTGWG. It's actually similar to OPSAWG.


Regards, Benoit
2014-10-02
04-03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Editorial point/

RTGWG may also work on specific small topics that do not fit with an existing
working group. An example of a …
[Ballot comment]
Editorial point/

RTGWG may also work on specific small topics that do not fit with an existing
working group. An example of a small topic is a draft that might otherwise be
AD-sponsored but which could benefit from the review and consensus that RTGWG
can provide.

Not sure "small" is the right adjective.
In OPSAWG, we had small topics that became big topics (example: 3 CAPWAP documents, multiple EMAN documents that triggered the EMAN WG creation, IEEE/IETF MIB relationship RFC). I would remove "small", which equates to "non important"
2014-10-02
04-03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Block, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2014-10-02
04-03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] Position for Spencer Dawkins has been changed to Yes from No Objection
2014-10-02
04-03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot comment]
As a survivor of a few proposals being Dispatched in RAI, I'm glad to see RTG adopting a similar model for proposal evaluation.
2014-10-02
04-03 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2014-10-02
04-03 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2014-10-02
04-03 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2014-10-02
04-03 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2014-10-01
04-03 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2014-10-01
04-03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2014-10-01
04-03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2014-10-01
04-03 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2014-10-01
04-03 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot comment]
The updated charter looks good, I support the update.
2014-10-01
04-03 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2014-10-01
04-03 Alia Atlas New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-03.txt
2014-10-01
04-02 Barry Leiba [Ballot comment]
I agree with the comment that "optional" should be removed from the first sentence.
2014-10-01
04-02 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2014-09-30
04-02 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Fully support this: a good change.

I do not believe this change needs to go for external review.

Nit...
s/an optional venue/a venue/ …
[Ballot comment]
Fully support this: a good change.

I do not believe this change needs to go for external review.

Nit...
s/an optional venue/a venue/
(There is nothing in "a venue" that implies compulsion)

---

Just noticed something we should add:
RTGWG would be a really good home for routing-related YANG models that are not specifically covered by other RTG working groups, and for generic routing YANG models.
Could this be added as a work item?
2014-09-30
04-02 Adrian Farrel Ballot comment text updated for Adrian Farrel
2014-09-30
04-02 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2014-09-29
04-02 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2014-09-26
04-02 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Fully support this: a good change.

I do not believe this change needs to go for external review.

Nit...
s/an optional venue/a venue/ …
[Ballot comment]
Fully support this: a good change.

I do not believe this change needs to go for external review.

Nit...
s/an optional venue/a venue/
(There is nothing in "a venue" that implies compulsion)
2014-09-26
04-02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2014-09-25
04-02 Alia Atlas WG action text was changed
2014-09-25
04-02 Alia Atlas WG review text was changed
2014-09-25
04-02 Alia Atlas Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2014-09-25
04-02 Alia Atlas State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review
2014-09-25
04-02 Alia Atlas Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-10-02
2014-09-19
04-02 Alia Atlas New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02.txt
2014-08-27
04-01 Alia Atlas New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-01.txt
2014-08-27
04-00 Alia Atlas Notification list changed to rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
2014-08-27
04-00 Alia Atlas Responsible AD changed to Alia Atlas
2014-08-27
04-00 Alia Atlas Storing first pass at the updated charter to emphasize RTGWG's role for dispatching new work.
2014-08-27
04-00 Alia Atlas State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved
2014-08-27
04-00 Alia Atlas New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-00.txt
2012-01-10
04 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-04.txt
2012-01-09
03 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-03.txt
2009-08-29
02 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-02.txt
2004-02-19
01 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-rtgwg-01.txt