Liaison statement
LS152 - Dependency between MPLS-TP Recommendations and RFCs [Ref #10.05]
Additional information about IETF liaison relationships is available on the
IETF webpage
and the
Internet Architecture Board liaison webpage.
| State | Posted |
|---|---|
| Submitted Date | 2010-03-15 |
| From Group | ITU-T-SG-15 |
| From Contact | Hiroshi Ota |
| To Group | mpls |
| To Contacts | swallow@cisco.com loa@pi.nu |
| Cc | paf@cisco.com stbryant@cisco.com adrian.farrel@huawei.com rcallon@juniper.net mpls@ietf.org yoichi.maeda@ntt-at.co.jp steve.trowbridge@alcatel-lucent.com |
| Response Contact | tsbsg15@itu.int greg.jones@itu.int hiroshi.ota@itu.int |
| Technical Contact | malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn |
| Purpose | For comment |
| Deadline | 2010-04-12 Action Taken |
| Attachments |
LS152 - Dependency between MPLS-TP Recommendations and RFCs [Ref #10.05] - pdf body
LS152 - Dependency between MPLS-TP Recommendations and RFCs [Ref #10.05] - pdf attach |
| Body |
Thank you for your liaison statement (Ref # 10.04) on the dependency between the ITU-T Recommendations and the RFCs that they will reference. An updated dependency table is attached reflecting the changes that you proposed and the results of further discussion. One outstanding issue is the references related to security. As noted in our comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-10 we would expect that references in the security section of that draft would be aligned with the security references that you proposed for inclusion in the dependency table. We can confirm that where a reference is indicated as “informational” that will be included in the bibliography and can reference a working group draft as “work in progress”. Please confirm that we are now aligned on the list of RFCs that we will need to reference. See Attachment. |