IESG agenda: 2017-05-25

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates
Proposed Standard
Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-anima-grasp
Proposed Standard
A Generic Autonomic Signaling Protocol (GRASP)
Token
Terry Manderson (OPS area)
Deferred by
Mirja K├╝hlewind on 2017-05-08
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection
Proposed Standard
Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-idr-shutdown
Proposed Standard
BGP Administrative Shutdown Communication
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
Proposed Standard
Aggressive use of DNSSEC-validated Cache
Token
Terry Manderson (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps
Best Current Practice
OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles
Proposed Standard
Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs
Proposed Standard
File System Extended Attributes in NFSv4
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning
Proposed Standard
Rules for NFSv4 Extensions and Minor Versions
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask
Proposed Standard
Allowing Inheritable NFSv4 ACLs to Override the Umask
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead
Proposed Standard
ECDHE_PSK with AES-GCM and AES-CCM Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Token
Kathleen Moriarty (SEC area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-pals-vpls-pim-snooping
Informational
Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) over Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)
Token
Deborah Brungard (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop
Informational
On Interoperation of Labels Among Conventional DNS and Other Resolution Systems
Token
Terry Manderson (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules
Informational
Variant Rules
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)