IESG agenda: 2018-11-21

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-clue-protocol
Proposed Standard
Protocol for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-clue-signaling
Proposed Standard
Session Signaling for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Polycom, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-clue-signaling
Polycom, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-clue-signaling

IETF stream
draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange
Proposed Standard
OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange
Token
Eric Rescorla (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Unknown
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns
Proposed Standard
Split DNS Configuration for IKEv2
Token
Eric Rescorla (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ntp-mac
Proposed Standard
Message Authentication Code for the Network Time Protocol
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric
Proposed Standard
IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-cbor-cddl
Proposed Standard
Concise data definition language (CDDL): a notational convention to express CBOR and JSON data structures
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
Proposed Standard
C-DNS: A DNS Packet Capture Format
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken
Proposed Standard
PASSporT SHAKEN Extension (SHAKEN)
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis
Proposed Standard
Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol
Experimental
Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) Protocol
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

(None)

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4.3 For action

Conflict review
conflict-review-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
IETF conflict review for draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
ISE Informational
draft-jenkins-cnsa-cert-crl-profile
Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile
Token
Alissa Cooper

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

WG name
Hypertext Transfer Protocol (httpbis)
Charter
charter-ietf-httpbis-(07-01)
Area
ART (Alexey Melnikov)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange (mile)
Charter
charter-ietf-mile-(03-03)
Area
SEC (Alexey Melnikov)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 Designated Experts for the draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric (Alvaro Retana)

6.2 Extending Last Calls around/during IETF Meetings (Secretariat)

6.3 Secondary expert for the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extensions registry (Adam Roach)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)