Last Call Review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-32
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-32-rtgdir-lc-hares-2023-08-23-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 31 (document currently at 34) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-09-01 | |
| Requested | 2023-01-05 | |
| Requested by | Ines Robles | |
| Authors | Pascal Thubert , Rahul Jadhav , Michael Richardson | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-08-23 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -32
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -31 by Klaas Wierenga (diff) |
|
| Comments |
Hello, ROLL WG kindly request for a routing directorate review and security directorate review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31. The review deadline is 22 of January. If you need more time please let us know. Abstract: "This document extends RFC 6550, RFC 6553, and RFC 8138 to enable a RPL Root to install and maintain Projected Routes within its DODAG, along a selected set of nodes that may or may not include itself, for a chosen duration. This potentially enables routes that are more optimized or resilient than those obtained with the classical distributed operation of RPL, either in terms of the size of a Routing Header or in terms of path length, which impacts both the latency and the packet delivery ratio." Many thanks, Ines. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Susan Hares |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/9rBQj-dOldU2W-4nvfspE2QqqaQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 32 (document currently at 34) | |
| Result | Has issues | |
| Completed | 2023-08-23 |
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-32-rtgdir-lc-hares-2023-08-23-00
Error; cannot read (/assets/ietfdata/doc/review/review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-32-rtgdir-lc-hares-2023-08-23.txt)