Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content Type
draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-01
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
01 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre |
2012-08-22
|
01 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alexey Melnikov |
2010-04-26
|
01 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2010-04-26
|
01 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2010-04-26
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
2010-04-26
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2010-04-26
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2010-04-26
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2010-04-25
|
01 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Scott Kelly. |
2010-04-23
|
01 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-04-22
|
01 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
2010-04-21
|
01 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
2010-04-21
|
01 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
2010-04-21
|
01 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant |
2010-04-19
|
01 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot discuss] I second Alexey's discuss. |
2010-04-19
|
01 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre |
2010-04-19
|
01 | Tim Polk | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk |
2010-04-19
|
01 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
2010-04-19
|
01 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2010-04-17
|
01 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Sean Turner |
2010-04-16
|
01 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
2010-04-15
|
01 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk |
2010-04-15
|
01 | Tim Polk | Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk |
2010-04-14
|
01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot discuss] This is almost nitpicking, but I think it is important to be precise: 2. EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo The de facto standard used to encrypt … [Ballot discuss] This is almost nitpicking, but I think it is important to be precise: 2. EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo The de facto standard used to encrypt the PrivateKeyInfo structure, which is subsequently placed in the EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo encryptedData field, is Password Based Encryption (PBE) based on PKCS#5 [RFC2898] and PKCS#12 [P12]. The major difference between PKCS #5 and PKCS #12 is the supported encoding for the password: ASCII for PKCS #5 and Unicode for PKCS #12. Unicode is not an encoding, it is a set of code points (characters). If PKCS #12 is using one of the Unicode encodings such as UTF-8, UTF-16LE, UTF-16BE, UCS-4, etc., please specify which one. |
2010-04-14
|
01 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov |
2010-04-14
|
01 | Alexey Melnikov | Created "Approve" ballot |
2010-04-12
|
01 | Tim Polk | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 by Tim Polk |
2010-04-12
|
01 | Tim Polk | [Note]: 'Carl Wallace (cwallace@cygnacom.com) is the document Shepherd' added by Tim Polk |
2010-03-24
|
01 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2010-03-24
|
01 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly |
2010-03-22
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2010-03-22
|
01 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2010-03-22
|
01 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
2010-03-22
|
01 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk |
2010-03-22
|
01 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
2010-03-22
|
01 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2010-03-22
|
01 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2010-03-22
|
01 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2010-02-04
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | **BEGIN DOWNREF ALERT** This document is headed for standards track, but there are normative references to three informative RFCs. RFC2898 is for Password Based Encryption … **BEGIN DOWNREF ALERT** This document is headed for standards track, but there are normative references to three informative RFCs. RFC2898 is for Password Based Encryption based on PKCS#5, RFC3394 if for AES Key Wrap, RFC5649 and is for AES Key Wrap with Padding. **END DOWNRED ALERT** PROTO write-up: 1.a - Carl Wallace is the Shepherd. He's personally reviewed the ID and personally knows it's ready for IESG publication. 1.b - The document has been reviewed by key IETF participants. There are no concerns about depth or breadth of the reviews. 1.c - There is no need for wider review. 1.d - There are no specific concerns that the AD and/or IESG should be aware of. 1.e - The consensus is solid. 1.f - There has been no threat of an appeal. 1.g - The Shepherd has personally verified that the document satisfies all ID nits. 1.h - The document splits it references. 1.i - The document has an IANA consideration and it is consistent with the main body (there are no IANA considerations). 1.j - The Shepherd has personally compiled the ASN.1 modules. Note that dummy OID values were used while we await final assignment. Technical Summary This document specifies algorithms to secure the asymmetric key content type defined in draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-03.txt. The algorithm choices and key sizes are based on RFC 5751, with the exception of content encryption algorithm and key wrap algorithm being AES Key Wrap with Padding. This rationale for the choice is in the security considerations. Working Group Summary This document is not the product of an IETF Working Group. Document Quality The document is short and lists the algorithms to be used based on the encapsulation mechanism. Personnel Carl Wallace is the document Shepherd. Tim Polk is the responsible Security Area AD. |
2010-02-04
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested |
2010-02-04
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'Carl Wallace (cwallace@cygnacom.com) is the document Shepherd' added by Cindy Morgan |
2010-02-01
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-01.txt |
2009-11-11
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-00.txt |