Skip to main content

Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content Type
draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-01

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
01 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-26
01 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-04-26
01 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-04-26
01 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-26
01 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-04-26
01 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-04-26
01 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-04-25
01 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Scott Kelly.
2010-04-23
01 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22
2010-04-22
01 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
01 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
01 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-22
01 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-04-22
01 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-22
01 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-22
01 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-21
01 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-04-21
01 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-04-21
01 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-04-19
01 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
I second Alexey's discuss.
2010-04-19
01 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-19
01 Tim Polk State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk
2010-04-19
01 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-04-19
01 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-04-17
01 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-16
01 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-04-15
01 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk
2010-04-15
01 Tim Polk Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk
2010-04-14
01 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
This is almost nitpicking, but I think it is important to be precise:


2. EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo

  The de facto standard used to encrypt …
[Ballot discuss]
This is almost nitpicking, but I think it is important to be precise:


2. EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo

  The de facto standard used to encrypt the PrivateKeyInfo structure,
  which is subsequently placed in the EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo
  encryptedData field, is Password Based Encryption (PBE) based on
  PKCS#5 [RFC2898] and PKCS#12 [P12]. The major difference between PKCS
  #5 and PKCS #12 is the supported encoding for the password: ASCII for
  PKCS #5 and Unicode for PKCS #12.

Unicode is not an encoding, it is a set of code points (characters).
If PKCS #12 is using one of the Unicode encodings such as UTF-8,
UTF-16LE, UTF-16BE, UCS-4, etc., please specify which one.
2010-04-14
01 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-14
01 Alexey Melnikov Created "Approve" ballot
2010-04-12
01 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 by Tim Polk
2010-04-12
01 Tim Polk [Note]: 'Carl Wallace (cwallace@cygnacom.com) is the document Shepherd' added by Tim Polk
2010-03-24
01 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2010-03-24
01 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2010-03-22
01 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-03-22
01 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-03-22
01 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2010-03-22
01 Tim Polk State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk
2010-03-22
01 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2010-03-22
01 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-22
01 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-22
01 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-02-04
01 Cindy Morgan
**BEGIN DOWNREF ALERT**

This document is headed for standards track, but there are normative
references to three informative RFCs. RFC2898 is for Password Based
Encryption …
**BEGIN DOWNREF ALERT**

This document is headed for standards track, but there are normative
references to three informative RFCs. RFC2898 is for Password Based
Encryption based on PKCS#5, RFC3394 if for AES Key Wrap, RFC5649 and is
for AES Key Wrap with Padding.

**END DOWNRED ALERT**

PROTO write-up:

1.a - Carl Wallace is the Shepherd. He's personally reviewed the ID
and personally knows it's ready for IESG publication.
1.b - The document has been reviewed by key IETF participants. There are
no concerns about depth or breadth of the reviews.
1.c - There is no need for wider review.
1.d - There are no specific concerns that the AD and/or IESG should be
aware of.
1.e - The consensus is solid.
1.f - There has been no threat of an appeal.
1.g - The Shepherd has personally verified that the document satisfies
all ID nits.
1.h - The document splits it references.
1.i - The document has an IANA consideration and it is consistent with
the main body (there are no IANA considerations).
1.j - The Shepherd has personally compiled the ASN.1 modules. Note that
dummy OID values were used while we await final assignment.

Technical Summary

This document specifies algorithms to secure the asymmetric key content
type defined in draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-03.txt. The algorithm
choices and key sizes are based on RFC 5751, with the exception of
content encryption algorithm and key wrap algorithm being AES Key Wrap
with Padding. This rationale for the choice is in the security
considerations.

Working Group Summary

This document is not the product of an IETF Working Group.

Document Quality

The document is short and lists the algorithms to be used based on the
encapsulation mechanism.

Personnel

Carl Wallace is the document Shepherd. Tim Polk is the
responsible Security Area AD.
2010-02-04
01 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-02-04
01 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Carl Wallace (cwallace@cygnacom.com) is the document Shepherd' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-01
01 (System) New version available: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-01.txt
2009-11-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-algs-00.txt