Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP: Implementation Report
draft-retana-idr-add-paths-implementation-01
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(idr WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Alvaro Retana | ||
Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-11-13) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up | |
Document shepherd | Susan Hares | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document reports the results of an ADD-PATH implementation survey. The survey had 22 questions about implementations' support for advertising multiple paths in BGP. After a brief summary of the results, each response is listed. This document contains responses from six implementers who completed the survey. The editor did not use external means to verify the accuracy of the information submitted by the respondents. The respondents are considered experts on the products they reported on.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)