Skip to main content

Sieve Email Filtering: Spamtest and Virustest Extensions
draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Magnus Westerlund
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2006-11-08
05 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: David Harrington.
2006-10-23
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2006-10-17
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2006-10-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2006-10-06
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from RFC-Ed-Ack
2006-09-24
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-09-18
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-09-18
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2006-09-18
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-09-15
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-09-14
2006-09-14
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-09-14
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-09-14
05 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2006-09-14
05 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
Why isn't [I-D.newman-i18n-comparator] a normative reference?
2006-09-14
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2006-09-14
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2006-09-13
05 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Bill Fenner
2006-09-13
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Kessens
2006-09-13
05 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2006-09-13
05 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2006-09-13
05 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
The original solution seemed overly hackish.  Sadly, this bis draftn
moves in the same direction.
"Bleh, but it will work," is roughly my …
[Ballot comment]
The original solution seemed overly hackish.  Sadly, this bis draftn
moves in the same direction.
"Bleh, but it will work," is roughly my reaction
2006-09-13
05 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2006-09-13
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-12
05 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
While I agree with Magnus that an aggregated "what's different" would be handy, I don't think we consistently require such a thing be …
[Ballot comment]
While I agree with Magnus that an aggregated "what's different" would be handy, I don't think we consistently require such a thing be present.  If there is no working group assessment that it is needed, I think we should not create a new requirement that it be present.
2006-09-12
05 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
While I agree with Magnus that an aggregated "what's different" would be handy, I don't think we consistently require such a thing be …
[Ballot comment]
While I agree with Magnus that an aggregated "what's different" would be handy, I don't think we consistently require such a thing be present.  If there is working group assessment that it is needed, I think we should not create a new requirement that it be present.
2006-09-12
05 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ted Hardie
2006-09-12
05 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
The draft is missing a section describing the changes since RFC3685.
The current, version by version changes are indicated to be removed. …
[Ballot discuss]
The draft is missing a section describing the changes since RFC3685.
The current, version by version changes are indicated to be removed. Please aggregate these change note to indicate all changes of importance to an implementor that likes to update its implementation from RFC 3685 to this document.
2006-09-12
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2006-09-12
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2006-09-12
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2006-09-11
05 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault
2006-09-11
05 Lisa Dusseault Ballot has been issued by Lisa Dusseault
2006-09-11
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
Two suggestions from Gen-ART review by Francis Dupont:
- in 1 page 4: e.g. -> e.g.,
- in 4 page 11: IHMO "unknown …
[Ballot comment]
Two suggestions from Gen-ART review by Francis Dupont:
- in 1 page 4: e.g. -> e.g.,
- in 4 page 11: IHMO "unknown content and origin" is a bit weak, I'd prefer
  something like "unknown content or untrusted origin"?
2006-09-11
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Brian Carpenter
2006-09-10
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2006-09-10
05 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2006-09-08
05 Lisa Dusseault Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-09-14 by Lisa Dusseault
2006-09-08
05 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lisa Dusseault
2006-08-16
05 Yoshiko Fong
IANA Last Call Comment:

Upon approval of this document IANA understands that there are three actions it must complete.

Action 1:
Replacement of the spamtest …
IANA Last Call Comment:

Upon approval of this document IANA understands that there are three actions it must complete.

Action 1:
Replacement of the spamtest registration in the registry located at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions with the following template:

Capability name: spamtest
Capability keyword: spamtest
Capability arguments: N/A
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: this RFC
Person and email address to contact for further information:

Cyrus Daboo


Action 2:
Replacement of the virustest registration in the registry located at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions with the following template:

Capability name: virustest
Capability keyword: virustest
Capability arguments: N/A
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: this RFC
Person and email address to contact for further information:

Cyrus Daboo


Action 3:
Addition of the spamtestplus registration in the registry located at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sieve-extensions with the following template:

Capability name: spamtestplus
Capability keyword: spamtestplus
Capability arguments: :percent
Standards Track/IESG-approved experimental RFC number: this RFC
Person and email address to contact for further information:

Cyrus Daboo


We understand the above to be the only IANA actions for this document.
2006-08-07
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2006-07-28
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2006-07-24
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-07-24
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-07-24
05 Lisa Dusseault Last Call was requested by Lisa Dusseault
2006-07-24
05 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Lisa Dusseault
2006-07-24
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-07-24
05 (System) Last call text was added
2006-07-24
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-07-21
05 Lisa Dusseault Draft Added by Lisa Dusseault in state Publication Requested
2006-07-13
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-05.txt
2006-06-29
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-04.txt
2006-06-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-03.txt
2006-01-20
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-02.txt
2005-07-19
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-01.txt
2005-02-03
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sieve-spamtestbis-00.txt