Skip to main content

Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush
draft-ietf-jmap-webpush-vapid-01

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (jmap WG)
Author Daniel Gultsch
Last updated 2024-03-20 (Latest revision 2024-03-19)
Replaces draft-gultsch-jmap-webpush-vapid
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state In WG Last Call
Associated WG milestone
Apr 2024
Submit Webpush Vapid document to IESG
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-ietf-jmap-webpush-vapid-01
JMAP                                                          D. Gultsch
Internet-Draft                                             20 March 2024
Intended status: Standards Track                                        
Expires: 21 September 2024

                      Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush
                    draft-ietf-jmap-webpush-vapid-01

Abstract

   This document defines a method for JMAP servers to advertise their
   capability to authenticate WebPush notifications using the Voluntary
   Application Server Identification protocol.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 September 2024.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Gultsch                 Expires 21 September 2024               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft        Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush            March 2024

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Discovering Support for VAPID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Issuing Push Notifications  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     6.1.  Registration of the JMAP Capability for VAPID . . . . . .   3
   7.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1.  Introduction

   JMAP [RFC8620] specifies how clients can subscribe to events using a
   protocol that is compatible to WebPush [RFC8030].  Some push services
   require that the application server authenticates all push messages
   using the Voluntary Application Server Identification protocol
   [RFC8292].  To faciliate that the client (or user agent in WebPush
   terminology) needs the VAPID public key of the application server to
   pass it along to the push service when retrieving a new endpoint.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.  These words may also appear in this
   document in lower case as plain English words, absent their normative
   meanings.

3.  Discovering Support for VAPID

   The JMAP capabilities object is returned as part of the standard JMAP
   session object (see Section 2 of [RFC8620]).  Servers supporting this
   specification MUST add a property called
   "urn:ietf:params:jmap:webpush-vapid" to the capabilities object.  The
   value of this property is an object that MUST contain the following
   information:

   *  applicationServerKey: "String"

      The P-256 public key that the push service will use to
      authenticate the application server, encoded in URL-safe base64
      representation as defined in [RFC4648].

Gultsch                 Expires 21 September 2024               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft        Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush            March 2024

4.  Issuing Push Notifications

   Every time the server sends a push message to a PushSubscription URL
   it MUST authenticate that POST request using the protocol outlined in
   [RFC8292].  This includes both StateChange events and
   PushVerification notifications.

5.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations for JMAP ([RFC8620], especially
   Section 8.6 and Section 8.7 of that document), WebPush ([RFC8030])
   and VAPID ([RFC8292]) apply to this document.

6.  IANA Considerations

6.1.  Registration of the JMAP Capability for VAPID

   This specification requests IANA to register the JMAP Capability for
   VAPID with the following data:

   Capability Name: urn:ietf:params:jmap:webpush-vapid

   Specification document: this document

   Intended use: common

   Change Controller: IETF

7.  Normative References

   [RFC8620]  Jenkins, N. and C. Newman, "The JSON Meta Application
              Protocol (JMAP)", RFC 8620, DOI 10.17487/RFC8620, July
              2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8620>.

   [RFC8030]  Thomson, M., Damaggio, E., and B. Raymor, Ed., "Generic
              Event Delivery Using HTTP Push", RFC 8030,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8030, December 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8030>.

   [RFC8292]  Thomson, M. and P. Beverloo, "Voluntary Application Server
              Identification (VAPID) for Web Push", RFC 8292,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8292, November 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8292>.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

Gultsch                 Expires 21 September 2024               [Page 3]
Internet-Draft        Use of VAPID in JMAP WebPush            March 2024

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [RFC4648]  Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
              Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>.

Author's Address

   Daniel Gultsch
   Email: daniel@gultsch.de

Gultsch                 Expires 21 September 2024               [Page 4]