IETF conflict review for draft-wkumari-dnsop-defense-collision-mitigate
conflict-review-wkumari-dnsop-defense-collision-mitigate-00
Yes
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2013-12-14)
Unknown
While this draft was presumably targeted at dnsop, it was not discussed there that I can recall, nor is there active work in the area of collision mitigation that this conflicts with that I am aware of.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-12-17)
Unknown
FWIW, my preference would have been for this document to have been AD-sponsored. I realize that this is not a recommended technique (as the abstract notes), but if we had it in the IETF stream, we could at least say, "There was IETF consensus that this was worth documenting, and it is not recommended."
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-12-19)
Unknown
I agree with Richard as well. If the author's up for it. I don't tihnk I've seen such a short document not recommend itself so often. Well done! But why not add more? You could add that to sections 4 and 6 as well:-)
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-12-18)
Unknown
Richard makes a valid point.
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown