Layer Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment
charter-ietf-lime-01
Yes
(Joel Jaeggli)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-10 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2014-10-14 for -00-10)
Unknown
We have not received any feedback from the external review.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-15 for -00-11)
Unknown
A clause crept in between -10 and -11. While I don't want to block on it, I do want to raise it because it is a subject that got a lot of discussion on the LIME mailing list going right back to when it was the TIME mailing list. it is one of the topics that was in the original proposal, but was scoped out to get focus in the work... including management mechanisms to facilitate mapping between OAM mechanisms at different layers This concept was spoken against in strong terms in the RTGWG meeting in Toronto suggesting it is even a dangerous idea. I would suggest, therefore, that if it is to be added to the charter, it should be described in more detail.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-12)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-10)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-10)
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-14 for -00-10)
Unknown
Is the working assumption that the same administrative domain manages all the layers, if you're using what LIME produces? I'm thinking of a VoIP carrier that has one operations group that runs all their SIP servers, another that runs their WAN IP network, and one or more groups that runs their access networks, for example. If that's obviously in scope, out of scope, or silly, please carry on.
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-11)
Unknown