Automated Certificate Management Environment (acme)
|2019-11-26||Rich Salz||Added milestone "S/MIME WGLC" for review, due January 2020|
|2019-11-26||Rich Salz||Deleted milestone "WGLC or Dismissal"|
|2019-11-26||Rich Salz||Changed milestone "TNAuthlist submitted to IESG", set due date to April 2020 from December 2019|
|2019-10-25||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-106|
|2019-08-23||Roman Danyliw||Changed milestone "SMIME submitted to IESG", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone|
|2019-08-23||Roman Danyliw||Changed milestone "TNAuthlist submitted to IESG", set state to active from review, accepting new milestone|
|2019-08-21||Rich Salz||Added milestone "WGLC or Dismissal" for review, due April 2020|
|2019-08-21||Rich Salz||Added milestone "SMIME submitted to IESG" for review, due April 2020|
|2019-08-21||Rich Salz||Added milestone "TNAuthlist submitted to IESG" for review, due December 2019|
|2019-08-21||Rich Salz||Changed milestone "Submit working group draft to IESG as Proposed Standard", resolved as "Done"|
|2019-08-21||Rich Salz||Changed milestone "Initial working group draft", resolved as "Done"|
|2019-06-28||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-105|
|2019-03-27||Cindy Morgan||Shepherding AD changed to <b>Roman Danyliw</b> from|
|2019-03-01||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-104|
|2018-10-19||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-103|
As of IETF 102:
ACME met Tuesday afternoon. It was a very productive meeting. This status also serves as a reminder that we need 90 ...
As of IETF 102:
ACME met Tuesday afternoon. It was a very productive meeting. This status also serves as a reminder that we need 90 minutes next time. :) Or the chair(s) need to be more ruthless about enforcing the unreasonable time limits.
The agenda was augmented by two last-minute presentations, from the ANRW/hotRFC and SECDISPATCH. The first was on scope and some mitigation for IP address use-after-free, and the second was on using ACME for STAR. Both had good discussion, and are likely to be taken up by the WG soon. So this is a point in favor of those forums.
In other work, the WG accepted a PR that addresses the last AD comments, and is redoing WGLC in parallel with IESG review. The ALPN and IP documents will be moved to WGLC. The email docs need another draft and then hopefully move to WGLC. Everyone should read the Authority Token documents.
|2018-07-03||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-102|
|2018-03-21||Cindy Morgan||Shepherding AD changed to <b>Eric Rescorla</b> from Kathleen Moriarty|
|2018-02-27||Liz Flynn||sent scheduled notification for IETF-101|
|2017-10-20||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-100|
|2017-09-07||Cindy Morgan||Chairs changed to <b>Rich Salz, Yoav Nir</b> from Yoav Nir, Ted Hardie, Rich Salz|
|2017-06-23||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-99|
|2017-06-21||Cindy Morgan||Chairs changed to <b>Rich Salz, Ted Hardie, Yoav Nir</b> from Rich Salz, Ted Hardie|
|2017-03-03||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-98|
As of IETF-97:
ACME met Wednesday. Since the last IETF we resolved almost all issues on our main document, and at the meeting we agreed ...
As of IETF-97:
ACME met Wednesday. Since the last IETF we resolved almost all issues on our main document, and at the meeting we agreed on proposed resolution for all others. When the new draft is issued, we’ll enter WGLC and promote this as an “implementor’s draft,” like HTTP-bis did. We’ll consider it frozen until next IETF, and either re-enter last call or forward up for IESG review at the next IETF.
We had also adopted a CAA draft, had an initial presentation from Yaron on short-lived certs, and a heads-up on STIR interest on using ACME to get certs for phones. So between now and the next IETF we’ll also have discussion about re-chartering to add these new work items.
|2016-10-21||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-97|
At IETF 96 we reviewed progress in the latest draft. We will be "adding back" the older flow in addition to the more complicated/general flow ...
At IETF 96 we reviewed progress in the latest draft. We will be "adding back" the older flow in addition to the more complicated/general flow (variously termed preconditions or application) added in the latest draft. We are planning on being in last call before IETF 97.
We are actively soliciting drafts to consider for adoption and/or recharting for discussion in the early fall.
|2016-06-24||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-96|
At IETF 95, the group reviewed the issues closed in the creation of -02, then reviewed the open issues in draft-ietf-acme-acme. Three were explicitly deferred ...
At IETF 95, the group reviewed the issues closed in the creation of -02, then reviewed the open issues in draft-ietf-acme-acme. Three were explicitly deferred ((#4 #88 #89), and the group agreed to implement pull requests for others (#112, #113, and #114). Phillip Hallam-Baker proposed a syntactic shift for the current draft, which he will propose as a pull request by April 19th.
The group is hoping to complete version 1 and have a last call prior to IETF 96.
|2016-03-11||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-95|
|2015-10-09||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-94|
|2015-06-26||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-93|
|2015-06-26||Cindy Morgan||Added milestone "Submit working group draft to IESG as Proposed Standard", due 2016-03-31, from approved charter|
|2015-06-26||Cindy Morgan||Added milestone "Initial working group draft", due 2015-08-31, from approved charter|
|2015-06-26||Cindy Morgan||Charter approved, group active|
|2015-06-15||Cindy Morgan||Mailing list archive changed to <b><a href="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/">https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/</a></b> from <a href="http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/">http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/</a>|
|2015-05-22||Kathleen Moriarty||Shepherding AD changed to <b>Kathleen Moriarty</b> from Stephen Farrell|
|2015-05-22||Kathleen Moriarty||State changed to <b>Proposed</b> from BOF|
|2015-02-27||Stephanie McCammon||sent scheduled notification for IETF-92|
|2015-02-12||Stephanie McCammon||Info Changed|
|2015-02-12||Cindy Morgan||Group created in state BOF|