Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6
RFC 6757

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
13 (System) Notify list changed from netext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option@ietf.org to (None)
2012-10-19
13 (System) RFC published
2012-08-27
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-08-26
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2012-08-26
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-08-25
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-08-13
13 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-08-13
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-08-13
13 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from None
2012-08-13
13 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-08-13
13 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-08-13
13 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-08-13
13 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2012-08-10
13 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-08-10
13 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-10
13 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-09
13 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I assume the conclusion of the discussion you were having at IETF about the encoding of SSIDs fell out to UTF-8 instead of …
2012-08-09
13 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-08-09
13 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) Why doesn't this use geopriv?  I think Robert put this better than
I in asking why don't RFC 6280 considerations apply. I …
2012-08-09
13 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-09
13 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) Why doesn't this use geopriv?  I think Robert put this better than
I in asking why don't RFC 6280 considerations apply. I …
2012-08-09
13 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-08
13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-08-08
13 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13.txt
2012-08-08
12 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-08-02
12 Brian Haberman State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-07-30
12 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-30
12 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-12.txt
2012-07-23
11 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for solving some of my DISCUSSes
Here is the updated DISCUSS.

- I was proposing:

  Operator PEN ID

      …
2012-07-23
11 Benoît Claise Ballot discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2012-07-23
11 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
Thanks for solving some of my DISCUSSes
Here is the updated DISCUSS.

- I was proposing:

  Operator PEN ID

      …
2012-07-23
11 Benoît Claise Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2012-07-21
11 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
[Updating per email discussion]

3.1.1

  'E'-bit:  1-bit flag for representing the encoding of the following
      name field.  MUST be …
2012-07-21
11 Pete Resnick Ballot discuss text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-07-21
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) Why doesn't this use geopriv?

(2) cleared

(3) Why is it ok to send SSID and AP name  without asking the
user?  …
2012-07-21
11 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2012-07-19
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I've cleared.
2012-07-19
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-07-16
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-07-16
11 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-11.txt
2012-06-04
10 Alexey Melnikov Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov.
2012-05-24
10 Basavaraj Patil IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call
2012-05-24
10 Basavaraj Patil The I-D has been submitted to the IESG for publication as a proposed standard.
2012-05-24
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-05-24
10 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I'm piling on with Stephen and Robert.
2012-05-24
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-05-24
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-05-23
10 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
-The term "vendor" is confusing

  Vendor ID

      The Vendor ID is the SMI Network Management Private Enterprise
    …
2012-05-23
10 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
- I was wondering about the relationship between the Access Technology Type option and this new Access Network Identifier option. Both of the …
2012-05-23
10 Benoît Claise Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Benoit Claise
2012-05-23
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
( no change - just reformatting to make this easier to read in the tracker )

Can the document provide more clarity on …
2012-05-23
10 Robert Sparks Ballot discuss text updated for Robert Sparks
2012-05-23
10 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
Can the document provide more clarity on what kinds of things the LMA is expecting to use
the information carried by this extension …
2012-05-23
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-05-23
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
This is a not-quite-Discuss Comment

I think a number of references listed as Informative need to be moved
to Normative. Specifically:

SMI
RFC …
2012-05-23
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-05-23
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-05-23
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-05-22
10 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have a concern about tying the interpretation of the "Network Name"
field in the Network-Identifier Sub-option to the Access Technology
type in …
2012-05-22
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-05-22
10 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
3.1.1

  'E'-bit:  1-bit flag for representing the encoding of the following
      name field.  MUST be set to zero (0) …
2012-05-22
10 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-05-22
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-05-22
10 Benoît Claise
[Ballot discuss]
-The term "vendor" is confusing

  Vendor ID

      The Vendor ID is the SMI Network Management Private Enterprise
    …
2012-05-22
10 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
- I was wondering about the relationship between the Access Technology Type option and this new Access Network Identifier option. Both of the …
2012-05-22
10 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-05-21
10 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-05-21
10 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

(1) Why doesn't this use geopriv?

(2) Why is it ok to send the MN location (3.1.2) without asking
the user?

(3) Why …
2012-05-21
10 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-05-21
10 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-05-17
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-05-17
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-05-16
10 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
IANA Considerations rant:

  o  Action-1: This specification defines a new Mobility Header option,
      the Access Network Identifier.  This mobility …
2012-05-16
10 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman Changed protocol writeup
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-05-24
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman Ballot has been issued
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman Created "Approve" ballot
2012-05-14
10 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-09
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-05-07
10 Alexey Melnikov Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov.
2012-05-01
10 Pearl Liang
IESG:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-10 and has
the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are
three actions which IANA must …
2012-04-26
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-04-26
10 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-04-26
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2012-04-26
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2012-04-25
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2012-04-25
10 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>

To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> …
2012-04-25
10 Brian Haberman Last call was requested
2012-04-25
10 Brian Haberman Last call announcement was generated
2012-04-25
10 Brian Haberman Ballot approval text was generated
2012-04-25
10 Brian Haberman Ballot writeup was generated
2012-04-25
10 Brian Haberman State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-04-25
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-04-25
10 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-10.txt
2012-04-25
09 Brian Haberman State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation
2012-04-25
09 Brian Haberman State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-04-25
09 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-09.txt
2012-04-19
08 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of RFC? …
2012-04-19
08 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Basavaraj Patil (Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-04-19
08 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-04-19
08 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-04-19
08 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option
2012-04-14
08 Sri Gundavelli New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-08.txt
2012-03-08
07 Basavaraj Patil IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2012-02-09
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-06.txt
2012-02-09
07 Basavaraj Patil
Hello,

This is the working group last call for the I-D:
Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6
<draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-06.txt>

The I-D has been …
2012-01-26
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-05.txt
2012-01-07
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-04.txt
2012-01-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-03.txt
2011-12-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-02.txt
2011-12-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-01.txt
2011-08-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-00.txt