IANA-Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space
RFC 6598

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
15 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document requests the allocation of an IPv4 /10 address block to be used as Shared ...
2015-10-14
15 (System) Notify list changed from jason.weil@cox.com, victor.kuarsingh@rci.rogers.com, c.donley@cablelabs.com, cdl@asgaard.org, marla.azinger@frontiercorp.com, draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pete Resnick
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Wesley Eddy
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for David Harrington
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Ronald Bonica
2012-04-21
15 (System) RFC published
2012-04-02
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-03-26
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2012-03-25
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on ADs
2012-03-22
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on ADs from Waiting on Authors
2012-03-14
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from On Hold
2012-03-07
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to On Hold from Waiting on WGC
2012-03-05
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on WGC from In Progress
2012-03-01
15 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-02-29
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-02-29
15 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-02-29
15 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-02-29
15 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-02-29
15 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-02-29
15 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-02-28
15 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-02-27
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-02-27
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ronald Bonica has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-02-27
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-02-17
15 Amanda Baber We understand that the action requested by this document hasn't changed.
2012-02-17
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concern.
2012-02-17
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-16
15 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-15.txt
2012-02-16
15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-02-16
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2012-02-16
15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2012-02-15
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-15
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
My thinking has evolved through the last call discussions.  I now
have no objection to publishing this document.

In my original Discuss, I ...
2012-02-15
15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-14
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
Based on more and more and more and more discussion I'm reluctantly
ok with this. (Still)

In December I said:

  I think ...
2012-02-11
15 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I understand the commercial imperatives that the ISPs face, and appreciate this is a dilemma.

However, the authors have not so far generated ...
2012-02-10
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-02-06
15 Francis Dupont Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2012-02-02
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-02-02
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-01-31
15 Ron Bonica Setting stream while adding document to the tracker
2012-01-31
15 Ron Bonica Stream changed to IETF from
2012-01-31
15 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-02-16
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan Last Call was requested
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan Last Call text changed
2012-01-30
15 Cindy Morgan Last Call text changed
2012-01-30
14 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt
2012-01-27
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I am satisfied from the discussion on the IETF list that there is at least a reasonable risk to use current 1918 address ...
2012-01-27
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-27
13 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-13.txt
2011-12-19
12 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-12.txt
2011-12-18
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-18
11 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-11.txt
2011-12-15
15 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer::Revised ID Needed.
2011-12-15
15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-15
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer.
2011-12-15
15 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2011-12-13
15 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
I believe there is not IETF Consensus for approving a /10 for this purpose, and, as a result, there is not IETF consensus ...
2011-12-08
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-12-08
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-12-08
15 Jean Mahoney Assignment of request for Last Call review by GENART to Alexey Melnikov was rejected
2011-12-08
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2011-12-08
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2011-12-08
15 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Based on list discussion, I have come to the conclusion that this is the least worst workaround (not "solution") available to us at ...
2011-12-08
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-08
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
Based on more and more and more and more discussion I'm reluctantly
ok with this.

I think additionally allocating part of 240/4 would ...
2011-12-01
15 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
While I personally agree with the position that approving this allocation is the least bad of the available choices, I don't believe IETF ...
2011-12-01
15 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
I encourage pursuing Ralph's questions and carefully separating the question of allocating the address space and what effect CGNs may have on the ...
2011-12-01
15 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
While I personally agree with the position that approving this allocation is the least bad of the available choices, I don't believe IETF ...
2011-12-01
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-12-01
15 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
FWIW, the issue that I had with the previous incarnation of this document has been resolved. Thanks for working through the measurements and ...
2011-12-01
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-12-01
15 Peter Saint-Andre State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-12-01
15 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I agree with Ralph.
2011-12-01
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-12-01
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Ralph's DISCUSS: We need to first come up with a list of criteria by which consensus can be judged. While ...
2011-12-01
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Calling out one piece of Ralph's DISCUSS directly: I agree with Ralph and Stephen that the question of whether there is another existing ...
2011-12-01
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-12-01
15 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-01
15 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
I believe there is not IETF Consensus for approving a /10, and there is not IETF consensus to approve this document.

This document ...
2011-12-01
15 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-01
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
Based on recent discussion, I agree with Ralph that the issue of whether or not
some other address space would work here (e.g. ...
2011-12-01
15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] Position for Gonzalo Camarillo has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-12-01
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Ralph sumarized well and in details the reasons for which the IESG cannot approve this document under its current form and at this ...
2011-12-01
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-11-30
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I agree with the comments and discuss positions from others that say there is not IETF consensus on this document.
2011-11-30
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2011-11-30
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to Abstain from Discuss
2011-11-30
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I am posting a Discuss position for this document because the IESG
should discuss some fundamental issues of how we should make a ...
2011-11-30
15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-30
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I concur with Stewart that there does not appear to be IETF consensus around this I-D.

I am concerned that the alternative to ...
2011-11-30
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-11-30
10 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-10.txt
2011-11-30
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
I concur with the DISCUSS position lodged by Stewart Bryant.
2011-11-30
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-11-30
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-11-29
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup text changed
2011-11-29
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2011-11-29
15 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I understand the commercial imperatives that the ISPs face, and appreciate this is a dilemma.

However, the authors have not so far generated ...
2011-11-29
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
(revised in order to be more actionable)

As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
"NAT4444" should be "NAT444", I believe, in section 1, paragraph 3.
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that break under CGN, and break because of the CGN regardless of ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
"NAT4444" should be "NAT444", I believe, in section 1, paragraph 3.

As noted in the draft section 5.2, there are significant applications that ...
2011-11-29
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-11-29
15 Cindy Morgan [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to Discuss from No Record
2011-11-28
15 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2011-11-28
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup text changed
2011-11-13
15 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
RFC 1918 is a BCP.  Should this allocation really take place without
  achieving a similar level of IETF consensus?
2011-11-13
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-07
15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-11-01
15 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2011-11-01
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-11-01
15 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2011-10-27
15 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01
2011-10-26
15 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single
IANA action which must be completed.

IANA will record an allocation of an ...
2011-10-18
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: Dan Wing.
2011-10-10
15 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-10-10
15 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested
2011-10-10
15 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-10-10
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-10
09 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-09.txt
2011-10-09
08 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-08.txt
2011-10-09
15 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-09
15 Ron Bonica Intended Status has been changed to BCP from Informational
2011-10-03
07 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-07.txt
2011-09-27
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
The current version of the document address my DISCUSS comment in that it now says directly that this is to address broken CPE ...
2011-09-27
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-09-26
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-09-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-06.txt
2011-09-22
15 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-22
15 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-09-22
15 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I reviewed this document as a part of IESG document approvals this week.

I have to say that I found it difficult to ...
2011-09-22
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-22
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-22
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I support the many Discusses raised by other ADs and do not feel the
need to raise any more Discuss issues myself.

I ...
2011-09-22
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-22
15 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
1) I support Stewart's discuss.

2) I support Russ' discuss.

3) I support Wes' (and Pete's) discuss.
2011-09-22
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
1) I'd like to see some more text after the following sentence:

  Reverse DNS queries for
  Shared Transition Space addresses MUST ...
2011-09-22
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
15 Amanda Baber
IANA has concerns about the IANA Actions in this document

IANA believes that this should be a BCP or standards track document and
not just ...
2011-09-21
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
I agree with Russ's DISCUSS (as does IANA apparently).

It seems to me that the IAB should weigh in on this document.
2011-09-21
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Wes's DISCUSS. This has nothing to do with IPv6 transition. This is a new special-use NAT address space. In particular, ...
2011-09-21
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Russ's DISCUSS (as does IANA apparently).

I agree with Wes's DISCUSS. In particular, though I understand that much of the ...
2011-09-21
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
I share Russ' question about documenting the same level of consensus as 1918.
2011-09-21
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-21
15 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
RFC 1918 is a BCP.  Should this allocation really take place without
  achieving a similar level of IETF consensus?
2011-09-21
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
15 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
The authors state that there are no security issues because no protocol is defined. However the last para of section4
instructs certain filtering ...
2011-09-21
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-20
05 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-05.txt
2011-09-16
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
I don't plan to hold this DISCUSS past the telechat.

This document says the prefix will be used to support IPv6 transition and ...
2011-09-16
15 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
I don't plan to hold this DISCUSS past the telechat.

This document says the prefix will be used to support IPv6 transition and ...
2011-09-16
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-16
15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-09-13
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Wouldn't it be useful to note that this UPDATEs 1918?  Just so that
people going there for the bogon list get to ...
2011-09-13
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-12
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
I suggest changing "heritage" to "legacy".
2011-09-12
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-08-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-04.txt
2011-08-30
15 Ron Bonica Telechat date has been changed to 2011-09-22 from 2011-09-08
2011-08-26
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer.
2011-08-25
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Dan Wing
2011-08-25
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Dan Wing
2011-08-19
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Yaron Sheffer
2011-08-19
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Yaron Sheffer
2011-08-19
15 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-08-19
15 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested
2011-08-19
15 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested.
2011-08-19
15 Ron Bonica Last Call text changed
2011-08-18
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2011-08-18
15 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2011-08-18
15 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2011-08-18
15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-08-18
15 (System) Last call text was added
2011-08-18
15 Ron Bonica Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-08-18
15 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-08
2011-08-02
03 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt
2011-07-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-02.txt
2011-05-14
15 (System) Document has expired
2010-11-11
01 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-01.txt
2010-11-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-00.txt