Online Certificate Status Protocol Algorithm Agility
RFC 6277

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-01-21
11 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag)
2019-11-05
11 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Errata tag)
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from pkix-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2011-06-10
11 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-06-10
11 (System) RFC published
2011-06-02
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-11.txt
2011-03-18
11 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-03-17
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-03-17
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-03-17
11 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-03-17
11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-03-17
11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-03-17
11 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-03-17
11 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-17
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> A responder MAY maximize the potential for ensuring interoperability
> by selecting a supported signature algorithm using the following
> order of …
2011-03-17
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-17
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-11
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-11
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-10.txt
2011-01-07
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2011-01-06
2011-01-06
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-01-06
11 Tim Polk State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-01-06
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-05
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-05
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-05
11 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. Section 8.1 uses the phrases "considered unacceptably insecure" and "not considered acceptably secure". Are these equivalent?

2. In Section 8.3, please consider …
2011-01-05
11 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-05
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The RFC Editor will ask you to remove the citation from the Abstract.

---

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt shows
that OCSP is not a "well-known" acronym. …
2011-01-05
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I find a small discrepency at the end of Section 4

  The server SHOULD use one of the preferred signature algorithms for …
2011-01-05
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-04
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-04
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I am going to recuse myself from this draft because I was involved in proposing the ASN.1 structure.  I don't consider that an …
2011-01-04
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I am going to recuse myself from this draft because I was involved in drafting it in what I think was not an …
2011-01-04
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-01-04
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-04
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  The client MUST support each of the specified preferred signature
  algorithms and the client MUST specify the algorithms …
2011-01-04
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-04
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk
2011-01-04
11 Tim Polk Ballot has been issued
2011-01-04
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> A responder MAY maximize the potential for ensuring interoperability
> by selecting a supported signature algorithm using the following
> order of …
2011-01-04
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2011-01-04
11 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-12-21
11 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-01-06
2010-09-02
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-09.txt
2010-07-23
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-07-14
11 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-07-11
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2010-07-11
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2010-07-09
11 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-07-09
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-07-09
11 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2010-07-09
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-07-09
11 (System) Last call text was added
2010-07-09
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-07-09
11 Tim Polk State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk
2010-03-22
11 Tim Polk [Note]: 'Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> is the document shepherd' added by Tim Polk
2010-03-22
11 Tim Polk
Writeup for OCSP Algorithm Agility: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-08

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?

        Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed …
2010-03-22
11 Tim Polk Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested
2010-03-08
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-08.txt
2010-03-05
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-07.txt
2010-03-01
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-06.txt
2009-12-02
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-05.txt
2009-12-02
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-04.txt
2009-08-24
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-03.txt
2009-08-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-02.txt
2009-07-31
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-01.txt
2009-03-04
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ocspagility-00.txt