Early Retransmit for TCP and Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
RFC 5827

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
04 (System) Changed document authors from "Per Hurtig, Urtzi Ayesta, Konstantin Avrachenkov, Mark Allman" to "Per Hurtig, Urtzi Ayesta, Konstantin Avrachenkov, Mark Allman, Josh Blanton"
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt@ietf.org to (None)
2010-04-27
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-04-27
04 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5827' added by Amy Vezza
2010-04-26
04 (System) RFC published
2010-01-28
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-01-28
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-01-28
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-01-28
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-01-28
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-01-28
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-01-28
04 Lars Eggert State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert
2010-01-27
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt
2010-01-12
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ralph Droms
2010-01-12
04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I have cleared my Discuss.  The conversation with the authors has clarified that this specification is intended for experimentation without being "used in ...
2010-01-12
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot discuss]
2010-01-12
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-01-12
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have reluctantly cleared my Discuss on this document as this sort of issue should not hold up publication. The Discuss position achieved ...
2010-01-12
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot discuss]
2009-12-18
04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-12-17
2009-12-17
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2009-12-17
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
2009-12-17
04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Changing to Discuss...

If this doc is to be published as "Experimental", it should include plans to monitor the effect of protocol deployment ...
2009-12-17
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Ralph Droms
2009-12-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Section 2
s/less than four/fewer than four/

I agree with the Comment about providing more description of the Experiment. For me, this is ...
2009-12-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
After discussing this issue with other members of the IESG and with one of the authors, I am "upgrading" my previous Comment to ...
2009-12-17
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's DISCUSS and Ralph's COMMENT about the need to better define the conditions of the experiment, criteria to assess results, ...
2009-12-17
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's DISCUSS and Ralph's COMMENT about the need to better divide the conditions of the experiment, criteria to assess results, ...
2009-12-17
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Adrian Farrel
2009-12-17
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(1)

In sections 2.1 and 2.2 the text for evaluating the conditions is imprecise.  I suggest
the following edits to cover the case ...
2009-12-17
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-12-17
04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I agree with the COMMENTs by Raph and Adrian about the need to better divide the conditions of the experiment, criteria to assess ...
2009-12-17
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-17
04 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-12-17
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-12-17
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-12-17
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Section 2
s/less than four/fewer than four/

I agree with the Comment about providing more description of the Experiment. For me, this is ...
2009-12-17
04 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-12-16
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-12-16
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-12-16
04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
If this doc is to be published as "Experimental", it should include plans to monitor the effect of protocol deployment on the operation ...
2009-12-15
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-12-08
04 Lars Eggert State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lars Eggert
2009-12-08
04 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-12-03
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Paul Hoffman.
2009-12-03
04 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-11-28
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Paul Hoffman
2009-11-28
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Paul Hoffman
2009-11-24
04 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-11-24
04 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert Ballot has been issued by Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert Created "Approve" ballot
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-12-17 by Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert Last Call was requested by Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-11-24
04 (System) Last call text was added
2009-11-24
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert
2009-11-24
04 Lars Eggert [Note]: ' Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Lars Eggert
2009-11-19
04 Cindy Morgan
draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-03

  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2009-11-19
04 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2009-11-19
04 Cindy Morgan [Note]: '
Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-11-18
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-03.txt
2009-10-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-02.txt
2009-01-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-01.txt
2008-09-16
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-00.txt