Internet Voice Messaging (IVM)
RFC 4239

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
06 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document describes the carriage of voicemail messages over Internet mail as part of a unified …
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com> to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2005-11-05
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-11-05
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4239' added by Amy Vezza
2005-11-04
06 (System) RFC published
2004-06-17
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-06-17
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-06-17
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-06-17
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-06-17
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-17
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2004-06-17
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-06.txt
2004-06-15
06 Scott Hollenbeck Waiting for -06, which will include text per the cleared discusses.
2004-06-14
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-28
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2004-05-13
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-05-13
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
I removed my Discuss on the lack of negotiability/upgradeability of the codecs
because it's not IESG's job to second-guess strong WG consensus.  WG …
2004-04-03
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02
2004-04-02
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-04-02
06 Thomas Narten
[Ballot comment]
> client SHOULD implement to allow recipient's to display voicemail

s/recipient's/recipients/

There are an awful lot of normative references to IDs. Is this …
2004-04-02
06 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-04-02
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
---

Typo:  use and onramp/offramp  s/and/an

---
Typo:

The VOICE parameter on Content-Disposition from VPIM v2 [VPIMV2]
SHOULD be used to identify the …
2004-04-02
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
Interopability concern:
The must-implement audio formats are both toll-quality.  There isn't foresight for
interoperability with voicemail generated by  with a current mobile or …
2004-04-02
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
Interopability concern:
The must-implement audio formats are both toll-quality.  There isn't foresight for
interoperability with voicemail generated by  with a current mobile or …
2004-04-02
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-04-02
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-04-02
06 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-04-02
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
This draft was reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART

His comment:

This document is roughly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard,
but I …
2004-04-02
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2004-04-01
06 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-04-01
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot comment]
Needs an IPR section
2004-04-01
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-04-01
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
This draft was reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART
2004-04-01
06 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss]
This is a borderline DISCUSS. I'd like to hear the group's response to Spencer's comment - the point about this document having little …
2004-04-01
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-03-30
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-03-29
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations section says:

It is anticipated that there are no additional security issues beyond
those identified in VPIM v2 [VPIMV2R2] and …
2004-03-29
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Ted Hardie
2004-03-29
06 Ted Hardie
[Ballot comment]
This text in section 8>

  A sending implementation MAY determine the recipient capabilities 
  before sending a message and choose a codec …
2004-03-29
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-03-28
06 Bill Fenner
[Ballot comment]
>5. Transport
>
>The message MUST be transmitted in accordance with the Simple Mail
>Transport Protocol, as updated by the DRUMS working group …
2004-03-28
06 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-03-26
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-03-25
06 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
(25 March 2004)
The draft seems to mandate compliance with 2821 and 2822.  My impression was that the email community was not yet …
2004-03-25
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck Created "Approve" ballot
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-04-02 by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Change Notice email list have been change to <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com> from <jwn2@qualcomm.com>, <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com>
2004-03-23
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from Waiting for Writeup by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-23
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-03-09
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-03-09
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-03-09
06 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-09
06 Scott Hollenbeck Last Call was requested by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-09
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-03-09
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-03-09
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-03-09
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Note]: 'Revisions requested by  AD' has been cleared by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-09
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Note]: 'Revisions requested by  AD' added by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-03-09
06 Scott Hollenbeck Shepherding AD has been changed to Scott Hollenbeck from Ned Freed
2004-02-17
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-05.txt
2003-02-07
06 Ned Freed
AD review comments returned to WG:

The VPIM acryonym needs to be expanded in the abstract.

Section 4 states, in part:

  Any content type …
2003-02-07
06 Ned Freed Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2003-02-07
06 Ned Freed State Changes to AD Evaluation  :: Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Freed, Ned
2002-11-04
06 Ned Freed Draft Added by Freed, Ned
2002-07-02
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-04.txt
2001-11-29
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-03.txt
2001-07-24
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-02.txt
2000-11-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-01.txt
2000-07-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-00.txt