Policy-Mandated Labels Such as "Adv:" in Email Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best
RFC 4096

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from carl@media.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Brian Carpenter
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Record position for Mark Townsley
2005-05-31
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2005-05-31
05 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 4096' added by Amy Vezza
2005-05-27
05 (System) RFC published
2005-04-07
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-04-06
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-04-06
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-04-06
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-04-06
05 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-04-06
05 Michelle Cotton IANA Comments:
We understand this document to have no IANA Actions.
2005-04-05
05 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-05.txt
2005-04-05
05 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Mark Townsley has been changed to No Record from Discuss
2005-04-05
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Brian Carpenter
2005-04-04
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-04-04
04 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-04.txt
2005-04-01
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-03-31
2005-03-31
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-03-31
05 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-03-31
05 Mark Townsley [Ballot comment]
>    is contained in [RFC2822].  The the normative requirements that apply
>    to all headers are:

Double "the"
2005-03-31
05 Mark Townsley [Ballot discuss]
Useful document, but I have to agree with the Gen-Art review that the politicly-incorrect overtones could be reduced here without abandoning the point.
2005-03-31
05 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-03-30
05 David Kessens
[Ballot comment]
Comments from the Ops directorate by Pekka Savola (Mar 30 17:47:13 PST 2005):

Seems like a useful document.  I'm personally a bit dubious ...
2005-03-30
05 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-03-30
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-03-30
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Needs editing to avoid offending non-Anglo-Saxons.

See below for details

Document: draft-malamud-subject-line-03.txt

Trigger: IETF telechat, 31 March 2005
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
AD: Scott ...
2005-03-30
05 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Needs editing to avoid offending non-Anglo-Saxons.

See below for details

Document: draft-malamud-subject-line-03.txt

Trigger: IETF telechat, 31 March 2005
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
AD: Scott ...
2005-03-30
05 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-03-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck
2005-03-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck Ballot has been issued by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-03-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck Created "Approve" ballot
2005-03-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-03-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-03-31 by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-03-24
03 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-03.txt
2005-03-22
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2005-02-22
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-02-22
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-02-21
05 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-02-21
05 Scott Hollenbeck Last Call was requested by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-02-21
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-02-21
05 (System) Last call text was added
2005-02-21
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-02-21
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2005-02-21
02 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-02.txt
2005-02-18
05 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-02-18
05 Scott Hollenbeck
I would really like to see a discussion of the security implications of subject line tagging included in the "Security Considerations" section.  With that included, ...
2005-02-18
05 Scott Hollenbeck State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-02-08
05 Scott Hollenbeck Draft Added by Scott Hollenbeck in state Publication Requested
2005-02-07
01 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-01.txt
2005-01-31
00 (System) New version available: draft-malamud-subject-line-00.txt