Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers
RFC 3319
| Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(July 2003; No errata)
Was draft-ietf-sip-dhcpv6 (sip WG)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bernie Volz , Henning Schulzrinne | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 3319 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Allison Mankin | ||
| IESG note |
Comments sent to authors - 01 received and dhcpv6 to advance - checking fixes with Discussants [Note from Allison] |
||
| Send notices to | <rohan@cisco.com> | ||
Network Working Group H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 3319 Columbia University
Category: Standards Track B. Volz
Ericsson
July 2003
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv6) Options
for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document defines a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6
(DHCPv6) option that contains a list of domain names or IPv6
addresses that can be mapped to one or more Session Initiation
Protocol (SIP) outbound proxy servers. This is one of the many
methods that a SIP client can use to obtain the addresses of such a
local SIP server.
1. Terminology
This document uses the DHCP terminology defined in [1].
A SIP server is defined in RFC 3261 [2]. This server MUST be an
outbound proxy server, as defined in [3]. In the context of this
document, a SIP server refers to the host the outbound SIP proxy
server is running on.
A SIP client is defined in RFC 3261 [2]. The client can be a user
agent client or the client portion of a proxy server. In the context
of this document, a SIP client refers to the host the SIP client is
running on.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
[4].
2. Introduction
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) [2] is an application-layer
control protocol that can establish, modify and terminate multimedia
sessions or calls. A SIP system has a number of logical components:
user agents, proxy servers, redirect servers and registrars. User
agents MAY contain SIP clients, proxy servers always do.
This document specifies two DHCPv6 options [1] that allow SIP clients
to locate a local SIP server that is to be used for all outbound SIP
requests, a so-called outbound proxy server. (SIP clients MAY
contact the address identified in the SIP URL directly, without
involving a local SIP server. However in some circumstances, such as
when firewalls are present, or local dialing plans, local emergency
and other services need to be provided, SIP clients need to use a
local server for outbound requests.) This is one of many possible
solutions for locating the outbound SIP server; manual configuration
is an example of another.
3. SIP Server DHCPv6 Option
This document defines two DHCPv6 options that describe a local
outbound SIP proxy: one carries a list of domain names (Section 3.1),
the other a list of 128-bit (binary) IPv6 addresses (Section 3.2).
Since DHCPv6 does not suffer from a shortage of option codes, we
avoid the encoding byte found in the IPv4 DHCP option for SIP
servers [6]. This makes the option shorter, easier to parse,
simplifies appropriate word alignment for the numeric addresses
and allows the client to request either numeric or domain name
options using the "option request option".
An implementation implementing this specification MUST support both
options.
3.1 SIP Servers Domain Name List
The option length is followed by a sequence of labels, encoded
according to Section 3.1 of RFC 1035 [5], quoted below:
"Domain names in messages are expressed in terms of a sequence of
labels. Each label is represented as a one octet length field
followed by that number of octets. Since every domain name ends
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
with the null label of the root, a domain name is terminated by a
length byte of zero. The high order two bits of every length
octet must be zero, and the remaining six bits of the length field
limit the label to 63 octets or less. To simplify
implementations, the total length of a domain name (i.e., label
octets and label length octets) is restricted to 255 octets or
less."
RFC 1035 encoding was chosen to accommodate future
internationalized domain name mechanisms.
The option MAY contain multiple domain names, but these SHOULD refer
to different NAPTR records, rather than different A records. The
client MUST try the records in the order listed, applying the
mechanism described in Section 4.1 of RFC 3263 [3] for each. The
client only resolves the subsequent domain names if attempts to
contact the first one failed or yielded no common transport protocols
between client and server or denote a domain administratively
prohibited by client policy. Domain names MUST be listed in order of
preference.
Use of multiple domain names is not meant to replace NAPTR or SRV
records, but rather to allow a single DHCP server to indicate
outbound proxy servers operated by multiple providers.
The DHCPv6 option has the format shown in Fig. 1.
option-code: OPTION_SIP_SERVER_D (21)
option-length: Length of the 'SIP Server Domain Name List' field
in octets; variable.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_SIP_SERVER_D | option-length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SIP Server Domain Name List |
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: DHCPv6 option for SIP Server Domain Name List
SIP Server Domain Name List: The domain names of the SIP outbound
proxy servers for the client to use. The domain names are encoded
as specified in Section 8 ("Representation and use of domain
names") of the DHCPv6 specification [1].
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
3.2 SIP Servers IPv6 Address List
This option specifies a list of IPv6 addresses indicating SIP
outbound proxy servers available to the client. Servers MUST be
listed in order of preference.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_SIP_SERVER_A | option-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| SIP server (IP address) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| SIP server (IP address) |
| |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
option-code: OPTION_SIP_SERVER_A (22)
option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; must be a
multiple of 16.
SIP server: IPv6 address of a SIP server for the client to use.
The servers are listed in the order of preference for
use by the client.
4. Client Operation
A client may request either or both of the SIP Servers Domain Name
List and SIP Servers IPv6 Address List options in an Options Request
Option (ORO) as described in [1],
If a client receives both the SIP Servers Domain Name List and SIP
Servers IPv6 Address List options, it SHOULD use the SIP Servers
Domain Name List option. Only if no server in the SIP Servers Domain
Name List can be resolved or reached, the client MAY use the SIP
Servers IPv6 Address List option.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
5. Server Operation
A server MAY send a client one or both of the SIP Servers Domain Name
List and SIP Servers IPv6 Address List options.
If a client requests both options and the server is configured for
both, the server MAY send a client only one of these options and
SHOULD send the SIP Servers Domain Name List.
A server configured with the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option
MUST send a client the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option if that
client requested the SIP Servers IPv6 Address List option and not the
SIP Servers Domain Name List option in an ORO (see [1]).
The following table summarizes the server's response:
Client sends in ORO Domain Name List IPv6 Address List
__________________________________________________________________
Neither option SHOULD MAY
SIP Servers Domain Name List SHOULD MAY
SIP Servers IPv6 Address List MAY MUST
Both options SHOULD MAY
6. Security Consideration
The security considerations in RFC 3315 [1], RFC 3261 [2] and RFC
3263 [3] apply. If an adversary manages to modify the response from
a DHCP server or insert its own response, a SIP user agent could be
led to contact a rogue SIP server, possibly one that then intercepts
call requests or denies service. A modified DHCP answer could also
omit host names that translated to TLS-based SIP servers, thus
facilitating intercept.
7. IANA Considerations
The IANA has assigned a DHCPv6 option number of 21 for the "SIP
Servers Domain Name List" and the DHCPv6 option number of 22 for the
"SIP Servers IPv6 Address List" defined in this document.
8. Acknowledgements
Erik Nordmark and Alex Zinin provided helpful comments.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
9. Normative References
[1] Droms, R., Editor, Bounds, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C.
and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
(DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003.
[2] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP:
Session Initiation Protocol," RFC 3261, June 2002.
[3] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP): Locating SIP Servers", RFC 3263, June 2002.
[4] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to indicate requirement
levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[5] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987.
10. Informative References
[6] Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP-for-
IPv4) Option for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers," RFC
3361, August 2002.
11. Authors' Addresses
Henning Schulzrinne
Department of Computer Science
Columbia University
1214 Amsterdam Avenue, MC 0401
New York, NY 10027
USA
EMail: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
Bernie Volz
116 Hawkins Pond Road
Center Harbor, NH 03226-3103
USA
EMail: volz@metrocast.net
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 3319 DHCPv6 Options for SIP Servers July 2003
12. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Schulzrinne & Volz Standards Track [Page 7]