CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements for AAA
RFC 3141
| Document | Type |
RFC - Informational
(June 2001; No errata)
Was draft-hiller-cdma2000-aaa (individual)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Lipford , Pat Calhoun , Shinichi Baba , Peter McCann , Sanjeevan Sivalingham , Haeng Koo , Eric Jaques , Gopal Dommety , Byung-Keun Lim , Yingchun Xu , Mark Munson , Brent Hirschman , Xing Chen , Takahiro Ayaki , Charles Lo , Serge Manning , Takuo Seki , Raymond Hsu , Hajime Shiino , Tom Hiller , Pat Walsh | ||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| Stream | Legacy stream | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | Legacy state | (None) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 3141 (Informational) | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group T. Hiller, Lucent Technologies
Request for Comments: 3141 P. Walsh, Lucent Technologies
Category: Informational X. Chen, Alcatel
M. Munson
G. Dommety, Cisco Systems
S. Sivalingham, Ericsson Wireless Communications
B. Lim, LG Information & Communications, Ltd.
P. McCann, Lucent Technologies
H. Shiino, Lucent Technologies
B. Hirschman, Motorola
S. Manning, Award Solutions, Inc.
R. Hsu, Qualcomm, Inc.
H. Koo, Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
M. Lipford, Sprint PCS
P. Calhoun, Sun Laboratories, Inc.
C. Lo, Vodafone
E. Jaques, Vodafone
E. Campbell, CommWorks Corporation, A 3Com Company
Y. Xu, WaterCove Networks
S. Baba, Toshiba America Research, Inc.
T. Ayaki, DDI Corporation
T. Seki, DO Corporation
A. Hameed, Fujitsu
June 2001
CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements for AAA
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo specifies cdma2000 wireless data AAA (Authentication,
Authorization, Accounting) requirements associated with third
generation wireless architecture that supports roaming among service
providers for traditional PPP and Mobile IP services.
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 1]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
1. Introduction
The architecture is designed for use with a cellular network as an
access medium. Sections 1, 2, present a brief high level review of
the cdma2000 wireless data architecture. Section 3 presents cdma2000
AAA requirements.
This document specifies AAA requirements associated with a third
generation cdma2000 wireless architecture that supports roaming among
service providers for traditional PPP and Mobile IP services. The
architecture is designed for use with a cellular network as an access
medium.
Sections 1 and 2 present a brief, high level review of the cdma2000
wireless data architecture as an aid to interested AAA WG members.
Section 3 presents cdma2000 AAA requirements, and is self contained
relative to the architecture review.
1.1. Requirements language
In this document, the key words "MAY", "MUST, "MUST NOT", "optional",
"recommended", "SHOULD", and "SHOULD NOT", are to be interpreted as
described in [RFC2119].
Please note that the requirements specified in this document are to
be used in evaluating AAA protocol submissions. As such, the
requirements language refers to capabilities of these protocols; the
protocol documents will specify whether these features are required,
recommended, or optional. For example, requiring that a protocol
support confidentiality is NOT the same thing as requiring that all
protocol traffic be encrypted.
A protocol submission is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or
more of the MUST or MUST NOT requirements for the capabilities that
it implements. A protocol submission that satisfies all the MUST,
MUST NOT, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT requirements for its capabilities is
said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the
MUST and MUST NOT requirements but not all the SHOULD or SHOULD NOT
requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally
compliant."
1.2. General Service Requirements
o Provide service during subscriber visiting between wireless
networks systems while maintaining a formal customer-service
provider relation with only one wireless service provider.
o Support Traditional PPP and Mobile IP services:
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 2]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
o Support dynamic and static home address assignments for
Mobile IP
o Support a Home Agent in the mobile's home wireless network,
home ISP, or private network.
o Support IP Security on the Mobile IP tunnel between Foreign
Agent and Home Agent, in order to avoid the overhead of a
voluntary tunnel on the radio interface.
o Provide robust authentication, authorization and accounting
services (AAA):
o Provide separation of airlink resource AAA services and data
resource AAA services.
o Authenticate and authorize a mobile based on an IMSI and an
NAI. The architecture allows for a carrier to determine if
billing is based on the IMSI or the NAI.
o Support optional AAA broker services between wireless
carriers and between wireless carriers and other external
data networks.
o Allow for distribution of specific Mobile IP security key
information to support home agent assignment, fast handoff,
and fast HA-FA authentication assignment during
registration.
o Provide QoS
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 3]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
2. High Level Architecture
The high level architecture is shown in Figure 1. The six major
entities that compose the network are the Home Agent, the PDSN, the
AAA Server, the Radio Network, the HLR/VLR, and Mobile Client.
Visited Access Home Access
Provider Network Provider Network
+--------+ +--------+
| | SS7 | |
| VLR |-----------------| HLR |
| | | |
+--------+ +--------+
|
|
| Visited Access Broker Home IP
| Provider Network Network Network
| +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| | | | | | |
| | AAA |------| AAA |---| AAA |
| | | | | | |
| +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| \ \ |
| \ \ |
| \ \ |
| \ \ |
| \ \ |
+---------+ +---------+ +---------+
| | | | | |
| RN |-------| PDSN |-------| HA |
| | | | | |
+---------+ +---------+ +---------+
|
| Visited Access Home Network
| Provider Network -Private
Mobile| -Visited Provider
IP | -Home Provider
| -Home ISP
+--------+
| Mobile |
| Node |
+--------+
Figure 1: General cdma2000 Wireless IP Architecture
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 4]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
2.1. PDSN
o Acts as a Foreign Agent;
o Establish, maintain, and terminate link layer to the mobile
client;
o Initiate the authentication, authorization and accounting for
the mobile client;
o Optionally, securely tunnel using IP security to the Home
Agent;
o Receives service parameters from AAA for mobile client;
o Collect usage data for accounting purposes to be relayed to
AAA;
o Routes packets to external packet data networks or to the HA in
the case of reverse tunneling;
o Maps home address and Home Agent address to a unique link layer
identifier used to communicate with Radio Network.
2.2. Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Server
o Interact with the Foreign Agent and other AAA servers to
authorize, authenticate and perform accounting for the mobile
client;
o Provides mechanism to support security association between
PDSN/FA and HA and between the MN and PDSN/FA;
o For dynamic Home Agent assignment, dynamically identify an HA
and assign a MN on that HA, and provide the security
association between the MN and HA;
o Provide QoS information to the PDSN;
o Optionally, assign dynamic home address.
2.3. Radio Network
o Maps Mobile Client identifier reference to a unique link layer
identifier used to communicate with PDSN;
o Validates Mobile Station for access service;
o Manages physical layer connection to the Mobile Client;
o Maintain state of reachability for packet service between the
access radio network and the mobile station;
o Buffers packets arriving from the PDSN, when radio resources
are not in place or are insufficient to support the flow from
the PDSN;
o Relays packets between the mobile station and the PDSN.
2.4. Location Registers (VLR/HLR)
o Stores authentication and authorization information for the
radio network.
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 5]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
2.5. Home Agent
o Maintains user registration and redirects packets to the PDSN;
o Optionally, establish an IP secure tunnel to the PDSN/FA;
o Supports the dynamic Home Agent assignment;
o Optionally, assigns dynamic home address;
o Support reverse tunneling.
2.6. Mobile Node
o Support PPP;
o Can act as a Mobile IP Node; and support Foreign Agent
Challenge and NAI;
o Interacts with the Radio Network to obtain appropriate radio
resources from the network for the exchange of packets;
o Maintains knowledge of status of radio resources (e.g., active,
standby, dormant);
o Buffers packets when radio resources are not in place or are
insufficient to support the flow to the network.
3. AAA Requirements
3.1. Core AAA Requirements
The following is a summary of cdma2000 AAA specific requirements. In
these requirements, the serving network and home network may or may
not have a direct business relationship. In such cases in which
there is not a direct business relationship, service may be supported
indirectly via broker.
o Authenticate and authorize a user NAI in a roaming environment.
The NAI is obtained via CHAP (for traditional PPP service) or a
Foreign Agent Challenge (for Mobile IP service). A shared
secret exists between the mobile and its HAAA. The FAC will
typically be computed in a manner consistent with CHAP.
o Transport wireless data attributes from the home network to the
Serving network. This may often take the form of a user
profile.
o Encrypt or sign one or more AVPs in an AAA message between
home, serving network, or some broker across multiple AAA
server hops.
o Support a reliable AAA transport mechanism.
o This transport mechanism will be able indicate to an AAA
application that a message was delivered to the next peer
AAA application or that a time out occurred.
o Retransmission is controlled by the reliable AAA transport
mechanism, and not by lower layer protocols such as TCP.
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 6]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
o Even if the AAA message is to be forwarded, or the message's
options or semantics do not conform with the AAA protocol,
the transport mechanism will acknowledge that the peer
received the AAA message. However, if the message fails to
pass authentication, it will not be acknowledged.
o Acknowledgements should be allowed to be piggybacked in AAA
messages
o The reliable transport mechanism features shall have the
capability to detect silent failures of the AAA peer or path
to the AAA peer, to manage failure on a proactive basis.
o Transport a digital certificate in an AAA message, in order
to minimize the number of round trips associated with AAA
transactions. Note: This requirement applies to AAA
applications and not mobile stations.
o Support both proxy and non-proxy brokers, where non-proxy
brokers imply the broker terminates an entire request and
initiates a new request. AAA brokers should have the
capability to modify certain parts of AAA messages whereby
to operate to in non-proxy or proxy environments.
o Provide message integrity and identity authentication on a
per hop (AAA node) basis.
o Support replay protection and optional non-repudiation
capabilities for all authorization and accounting messages.
The AAA protocol must provide the capability for accounting
messages to be matched with prior authorization messages.
o Support accounting via both bilateral arrangements and via
broker AAA servers providing accounting clearinghouse and
reconciliation between serving and home networks. There is
an explicit agreement that if the private network or home
ISP authenticates the mobile station requesting service,
then the private network or home ISP network also agrees to
reconcile charges with the home service provider or broker.
Real time accounting must be supported.
o Provides security between AAA servers, and between AAA
server and PDSN or HA via IP security.
3.2. Mobile IP Specific Requirements and AAA
3.2.1. Mobile IP Security Discussion
Three Mobile IP security extensions are defined in RFC 2002:
. HA - FA
. MN - FA
. HA - MN
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 7]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Therefore, Mobile IP and IPsec security models differ in that Mobile
IP provides its own authentication mechanisms calculated within the
Mobile IP registration procedures whereas IPsec uses IPsec AH.
The keys and SPIs associated with the MN-FA and HA-FA extensions need
to be dynamically established in a roaming wireless carrier
environment. The MN-FA extension is useful for allowing a new FA
(PDSN) to quickly authenticate a mobile using the previous foreign
agent extension. The HA-FA extension is useful for the HA to ensure
that only FAs from carrier's with roaming agreements access the HA.
The MN-HA is usually provisioned, but for dynamic Home Agent
assignment, this security association must be dynamically created.
It is possible to use IPsec AH between MN and FA, FA and HA, and MN
and HA. IKE may be used to establish security associations between
these entities. However, use of IKE may pose a problem for smaller
mobiles and may introduce unacceptable delays for certain
applications (e.g., Voice Over IP). The following three sections
outline Mobile IP specific functions that benefit from AAA based key
distribution.
3.2.2. Dynamic Home Agent Assignment
A visited or home AAA server will optionally be able perform dynamic
HA assignment. For dynamically assigned HA, the visited AAA server
will indicate to the home AAA server whether it supports dynamic HA
assignment in those cases in which the mobile node requests dynamic
assignment. If so indicated, the home AAA server may choose to allow
the visited AAA server to perform the HA assignment. Otherwise, the
home AAA assigns the HA.
3.2.3. Fast Handoff
To achieve a faster handoff, the mobile may attempt to avoid an AAA
transaction with the home AAA server. To accomplish this, the mobile
may send the PDSN the Previous FA address in the RRQ message from the
mobile, along with the MN-FA authentication extension. The new PDSN
passes the Previous FA address and MN-FA authentication extension to
the visited AAA server. If the visited AAA server is able
authenticate the MN-FA authentication extension for the mobile, then
the visited AAA may be able to avoid an actual transaction to the
home AAA server.
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 8]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
3.2.4. HA-FA Authentication
To achieve a fast registration for the case of a mobile station with
a Home Agent, the PDSN and HA may receive from the AAA mechanism a
HA-FA key and SPI that is used to authenticate the PDSN and the HA to
each other.
3.2.5. Key Distribution
These functions are primarily useful in a wireless environment in
which handoffs may occur rapidly (implying a need for low latency),
or where mobile devices have limited computing power. To achieve
these functions, AAA will be used to securely pass keys and SPIs
between the serving network and target network in encrypted form.
These keys are then used for the specific functions outlined in this
document.
3.3. IKE and AAA
The use of IKE in the cdma2000 wireless architecture requires the use
of certificates. However, the AAA servers may be able to distribute
a pre- shared key to the Mobile IP Agents for use during Phase 1
ISAKMP exchanges. This may lessen the need for on-line revocation
checks.
3.4. Interoperability with RADIUS
Users with a home AAA server based on RADIUS may desire to roam into
a wireless carrier network that uses "new" AAA servers based on the
requirements in this document, and vice verse. The AAA protocol
should be designed in a way so as to make conversions to and from
RADIUS messages straight forward. This will allow for the
development of gateway processes to aid in interoperability. Note:
The features of the new AAA protocols which are beyond the feature
set of the RADIUS protocol will not be available for users while on
home or serving networks based on RADIUS.
4. References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
5. Security Considerations
This document is very much about security. These requirements do not
require the serving and home networks to not be in the same domain
nor must they have a direct relationship. The serving network
requires authorization from the home network so that the serving
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 9]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
network obtains proof it will get paid for services rendered to the
mobile. This implies the home network must authenticate the user.
AAA functions must be performed in a secure manner. The requirements
contained in section 2 outline the security required.
Mobile IP supports authentication mechanisms outside IP Security.
These mechanism may be enhanced in a cellular wireless environment by
allowing a home AAA server to distribute keys to the serving network.
Additionally, the home AAA server may be able to send a pre-shared
key to be used in Phase 1 ISAKMP security association establishment
between FA and HA. These keys would sent in encrypted form from the
home network to the serving network. As supported in the
requirements contained in section 2, the encryption could be handled
via public cryptography and certificates.
6. IANA Considerations
This document does not create any new number spaces for IANA
administration.
7. Acknowledgements
The authors are active members of the TIA TR45.6 committee.
8. Authors' Addresses
Pat R. Calhoun
Network and Security Research Center, Sun Labs
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
15 Network Circle
Menlo Park, CA 94025
USA
Phone: (650) 786-7733
EMail: pcalhoun@eng.sun.com
Ed Campbell
CommWorks Corporation, A 3Com Company
3800 Golf Road
Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
Phone: (847)262-2325
E-Mail: ed_campbell@commworks.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 10]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Gopal Dommety
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
USA
EMail: gdommety@cisco.com
Tom Hiller
Rm 2F-218
263 Shuman Dr.
Lucent Technologies
Naperville, IL
USA
Phone: (630) 979-7673
EMail: tom.hiller@lucent.com
Raymond T. Hsu
Qualcomm Inc.
6455 Lusk Blvd.
San Diego, CA 92121
USA
Phone: (619) 651-3623
EMail: rhsu@qualcomm.com
Mark A. Lipford
Sprint PCS
15405 College Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
Phone: (913) 890-4248
EMail: mlipfo01@sprintspectrum.com
Serge Manning
Award Solutions, Inc.
800 E. Campbell Rd., Suite 120
Richardson, TX 75081
Phone: (972) 664-0727 x350
EMail: serge@awardsolutions.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 11]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Peter J. McCann
Lucent Technologies
Rm 2Z-305
263 Shuman Blvd
Naperville, IL 60566
USA
Phone: (630) 713 9359
EMail: mccap@lucent.com
Mark Munson
1371 Winding Branch Circle
Atlanta, Georgia 30338
USA
Phone: (678) 339-4439
EMail: mmunson@gte.net
Haeng Koo
Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
1130 E. Arapaho Road
Richardson, TX 75081
USA
Phone: (972)761-7755
EMail: hskoo@sta.samsung.com
Pat Walsh
Lucent Technologies
263 Shuman Blvd.
1F-545
Naperville, IL
Phone: +1 630-713-5063
EMail: walshp@lucent.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 12]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Yingchun Xu
WaterCove Networks
One Century Centre, Suite 550
1750 E. Golf Road
Schaumburg, IL
Phone: +1 847-477-9280
EMail: yxu@watercove.com
Brent Hirschman
1501 Shure Dr.
Arlington Heights, IL 60006
USA
Phone: (847) 632-1563
EMail: qa4053@email.mot.com
Eric Jaques
Vodafone
2999 Oak Road, MS-750
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
USA
Phone: +1-925-210-3900
EMail: ejaques@akamail.com
Sanjeevan Sivalingham
Ericsson Wireless Communications Inc.,
Rm Q-356C
6455 Lusk Blvd
San Diego, CA 92126
USA
Phone: (858) 332-5670
EMail: s.sivalingham@ericsson.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 13]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Xing Chen
Alcatel USA
1000 Coit Road
Plano, TX 75075
USA
Phone: 972-519-4142
Fax: +1 972-519-3300
EMail: xing.chen@usa.alcatel.com
Byung-Keun Lim
LG Electronics Inc.
533, Hogye-dong, Donan-Ku, Anyang-shi, Kyungki-do, 431-080,
Korea
Phone: +82-31-450-7199
Fax: +82-31-450-7050
EMail: bklim@lge.com
Hajime Shiino
Lucent Technologies Japan Ltd.
25 Mori Bldg. 1-4-30 Roppongi,
Minato-ku Tokyo
Japan
Phone: +81-3-5561-3695
EMail: hshiino@lucent.com
Shinichi Baba
Toshiba America Research, Inc.
PO Box 136,
Convent Station, NJ 07961-0136
USA
Phone: (973) 829-4795
EMail: sbaba@tari.toshiba.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 14]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Takahiro Ayaki
DDI corporation
Ichibancho FS Bldg.
8, Ichibancho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo
Japan
Phone: +81-3-3221-9682
EMail: ayaki@ddi.co.jp
Alan Hameed
Fujitsu
2801 Telecom Parkway
Richardson, Texas 75082
USA
Phone: (972) 479-2089
Charles N. Lo
Vodafone AirTouch
2999 Oak Rd
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
USA
Phone: (925) 210-3460
EMail: Charles.Lo@vodafone-us.com
Takuo Seki
IDO Corporation
Gobancho YS Bldg.
12-3, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo
Japan
Phone: +81-3-3263-9660
EMail: t-seki@kddi.com
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 15]
RFC 3141 CDMA2000 Wireless Data Requirements June 2001
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Hiller, et al. Informational [Page 16]