Last Call Review of draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03
Thanks for your clarifications.
I was not aware of the request to add a new column in
draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks and since I did not see the column yet I could
So everything look OK for me now.
From: Johannes Merkle [
Sent: 02 April, 2013 4:22 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool.all at tools.ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org;
Subject: Re: GenART LC review of draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03
> 1. In table 1 the Transform ID are specified as TBD1 to TBD4. I
noticed that IANA have already assigned values
> 27-30. So they should be specified. If not it will be good to ask the RFC
editor before publication to update the table.
> I saw that you only asked IANA to allocate values.
I'll do so in the next version if it is not done by the RFC editor.
> 2. In the IANA section I did not understand to which table you are
referring to "For the new entries in the table
> of the Transform Type 4 repository, a reference to Section 2.3 of
> [IKE_DH_Req] shall be included in the column named "Recipient Tests"
indicating the required checks for the other peer's Diffie-Hellman public
This refers to the Table Transform Type 4 - Diffie-Hellman Group Transform
[IKE_DH_Req] requests from IANA to add a new column (named "Recipient
Tests") to that Table. We request IANA to add in that new column a a
reference to Section 2.3 of [IKE_DH_Req].
This request has been correctly understood by IANA, see email below.