Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19
review-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19-secdir-telechat-farrell-2020-04-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-04-07
Requested 2020-03-27
Authors Gorry Fairhurst, Tom Jones, Michael Tüxen, Irene Ruengeler, Timo Voelker
Draft last updated 2020-04-04
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Tim Chown (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -19 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stephen Farrell 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19-secdir-telechat-farrell-2020-04-04
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/o9ZSTobdGo3ia5rLJASiF8JjtwE
Reviewed rev. 19 (document currently at 22)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2020-04-04

Review
review-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19-secdir-telechat-farrell-2020-04-04

Thanks for addressing my earlier secdir comments on -15. I think
the ones below remain but are, from my POV, nits:

- Abstract: This draft aims for proposed standard but is
updating a BCP (RFC8085/BCP145).  I'm happy to leave the
process-lawyering for that to others.

- 6.3: I am surprised that the QUIC description here is ready
to be an RFC before QUIC itself. I do see there are
normative references, but the potential for a breaking change
still exists, and seems a bit unwise. (I'd suggest, holding
this in the WG 'till the referenced QUIC drafts are in the RFC
editor queue, or else taking that bit out and putting it into
a new I-D.)