Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-
|Requested rev.||no specific revision (document currently at 05)|
|Type||Last Call Review|
|Team||General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)|
|Draft last updated||2012-05-24|
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Martin Thomson
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Klaas Wierenga
Feature request for the tool: a place to put reviews so that I don't keep forgetting to CC the gen-art list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson at gmail.com> Date: 20 May 2012 19:34 Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 To: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss.all at tools.ietf.org I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2012-05-20 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft clarifies a point of potential confusion around the use of the TCP MSS. ÂThe draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC, with a couple of nits. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: Opinion... The draft seems a little long. ÂSection 4 contains the only truly crucial point: namely the one made after the matrix. ÂThat alone, plus the short description in Section 2, seems sufficient. The appendix is excessive. Section 6 does not contain security considerations. ÂIt need not contain anything. Sections 3 and 5 have extra indentation for their subsections. The table in Section 4 has a wayward period.