Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06
review-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06-genart-lc-even-2017-12-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-12-12
Requested 2017-11-28
Authors Xufeng Liu, Prateek Sarda, Vikram Choudhary
Draft last updated 2017-12-10
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Julien Meuric (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Roni Even (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06-genart-lc-even-2017-12-10
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2017-12-10

Review
review-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06-genart-lc-even-2017-12-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-12-10
IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-12
IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11

Summary:
The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: 

1.  in section  4  " type enumeration {
               enum 1 {
                 description "IS-IS level 1 routes.";
               }
               enum 2 {
                 description "IS-IS level 1  routes.";
               }"

enum 2 is IS-IS level 2 routes


2. In Appendix A , the figure with eth0 and the data tree with eth1. Also there is "ipv4-prefix": "198.51.100.0/24" which are not in the figure