Last Call Review of draft-ietf-repute-model-07
review-ietf-repute-model-07-genart-lc-even-2013-08-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-repute-model
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-08-29
Requested 2013-08-15
Authors Nathaniel Borenstein, Murray Kucherawy
Draft last updated 2013-08-29
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Donald Eastlake (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-repute-model-07-genart-lc-even-2013-08-29
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-08-29

Review
review-ietf-repute-model-07-genart-lc-even-2013-08-29

I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous review

As for making it a standard track document, I am not sure since it looks to me as an overview and not standard. And there is no normative language in the document.

Roni Even

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: 

draft-ietf-repute-model-07

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2013–8–20

IETF LC End Date: 2013-8–29

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

Minor issues:

I was wondering why the “Further Discussion” section 9.3 is part of the security section. I think it should be a separate section.

Nits/editorial comments:

Section 3 the end of 2

nd

 paragraph “mechansisms” to “mechanisms”