Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2019-09-27
Requested 2019-09-12
Requested by Susan Hares
Authors Enke Chen, John Scudder
Draft last updated 2019-09-14
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Matthew Bocci (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel Halpern
State Completed
Review review-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-07-rtgdir-early-halpern-2019-09-14
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/5b5DRfoysFj3IL3R079VWDs_u7A
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-09-14



I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft.

The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached.

<case 1> As this document has recently been adopted by the working group, my focus for the review is on providing a new perspective on the work, with the intention of catching any issues early on in the document's life cycle.

<case 2> As this document is in working group last call, my focus for the review was to determine whether the document is ready to be published. Please consider my comments along with the other working group last call comments.

<case 3> If neither of the above describes the circumstances of the review, then write a brief summary of the reasons for and purpose of the review here (get this from the WG chair if you are not sure).

For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Document: draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-07
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 25-Sept-2019
Intended Status: Proposed Standard

Summary: No issues found. This documents is ready to proceed to the IESG.

Major Comments: N/A

Minor Comments: N/A

   You might consider replacing "this" in "the value of this field" in the 2nd from last paragraph of section 2.  I knew what it had to refer to, but it stalled me and caused me to recheck the grammar twice before I was sure it said what it needed to say.  It may confuse some readers.