Telechat Review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14
review-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14-genart-telechat-halpern-2014-11-28-00

• Status
• Email expansions
• History

• Versions
• 00

Review
review-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14-genart-telechat-halpern-2014-11-28

Thank you Alan.  Those changes fully address my comments.
Yours,
Joel

On 1/27/14 8:28 AM, Alan Johnston wrote:



Joel,

Thanks for your review of the document.  We have made the changes you
suggested in your review in the -12 version.



http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-12.txt



Let us know if there are any other issues.

- Alan -


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh at joelhalpern.com
<

mailto:jmh

 at joelhalpern.com>> wrote:

    I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
    Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

    <

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/__area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq


    <

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.

    Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
    you may receive.

    Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10
         A Mechanism for Transporting User to User
             Call Control Information in SIP
    Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
    Review Date: 19-May-2013
    IETF LC End Date: 29-May-2013
    IESG Telechat date: N/A

    Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed
    Standard

    Major issues:

    Minor issues:
         The requirements discussions for redirection and referral
    (second paragraph of section 3, in regards REQ-3) includes what
    appears to be normative requirements on redirecting devices.
    a) This would seem to belong in section 4 on Normative Definition.
    b) It would seem that there ought to be some discussion of what
    happens with redirecting devices that do not understand this new
    UUI. (I presume things work, but I don't see how.)

    Nits/editorial comments:
         In section 8.2, given that this is a WG document, should the
    "the authors believe" actually be "the WG believes"?  Or even, given
    IETF rough consensus on this document, "the IETF believes"?
    _________________________________________________
    cuss mailing list
    cuss at ietf.org <

mailto:cuss

 at ietf.org>
    

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/cuss


    <

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss

>