Telechat Review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14

Request Review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-03-25
Requested 2014-03-13
Authors Alan Johnston, James Rafferty
Draft last updated 2014-11-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Scott Kelly (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel Halpern 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-14-genart-telechat-halpern-2014-11-28
Reviewed rev. 14 (document currently at 17)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-11-28


Thank you Alan.  Those changes fully address my comments.

On 1/27/14 8:28 AM, Alan Johnston wrote:


Thanks for your review of the document.  We have made the changes you
suggested in your review in the -12 version.

Let us know if there are any other issues.

- Alan -

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh at


 at>> wrote:

    I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
    Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at



    Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
    you may receive.

    Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10
         A Mechanism for Transporting User to User
             Call Control Information in SIP
    Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
    Review Date: 19-May-2013
    IETF LC End Date: 29-May-2013
    IESG Telechat date: N/A

    Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed

    Major issues:

    Minor issues:
         The requirements discussions for redirection and referral
    (second paragraph of section 3, in regards REQ-3) includes what
    appears to be normative requirements on redirecting devices.
    a) This would seem to belong in section 4 on Normative Definition.
    b) It would seem that there ought to be some discussion of what
    happens with redirecting devices that do not understand this new
    UUI. (I presume things work, but I don't see how.)

    Nits/editorial comments:
         In section 8.2, given that this is a WG document, should the
    "the authors believe" actually be "the WG believes"?  Or even, given
    IETF rough consensus on this document, "the IETF believes"?
    cuss mailing list
    cuss at <