Last Call Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06
review-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06-genart-lc-korhonen-2017-07-23-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2017-07-25 | |
| Requested | 2017-07-11 | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-07-23 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Genart Telechat review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06-genart-lc-korhonen-2017-07-23 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2017-07-23 |
Review
review-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06-genart-lc-korhonen-2017-07-23
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2017-07-23 IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-25 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready to ship. Good that Proto Write-up took care of explaining downrefs. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: I just have one question whether the use of RFC2119 language in Section 5 Security Considerations is intentional? I mean here that sometimes e.g. "must" is in lower case and sometimes other keywords are in upper case e.g. "SHOULD NOT".