Last Call Review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04
review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06-01

Request Review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2019-11-29
Requested 2019-11-04
Requested by Suresh Krishnan
Authors Thomas Watteyne, Pascal Thubert, Carsten Bormann
Draft last updated 2019-11-07
Completed reviews Intdir Last Call review of -04 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -04 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Derrell Piper (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Francesca Palombini (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dave Thaler
State Completed
Review review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/I0TK8QHZ6KGh4_YfgJgZaUroHu4
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 12)
Review result On the Right Track
Review completed: 2019-11-07

Review
review-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-04-intdir-lc-thaler-2019-11-06

Downgraded status to "On the Right Track" based on Pascal's responses so far indicating that the intent of the document is quite different from what the document reads (to me anyway) as saying at present.  Pascal implies the intent is to be a normative specification of behavior, rather than a discussion of tradeoffs between two behaviors specified in other documents, being RFC 4944 and the lwig draft.   Such a scope change would require, in my view, more changes to text than simply what I said in my initial review.