Minutes interim-2023-asdf-03: Wed 15:40
minutes-interim-2023-asdf-03-202309271540-00
Meeting Minutes | A Semantic Definition Format for Data and Interactions of Things (asdf) WG | |
---|---|---|
Date and time | 2023-09-27 15:40 | |
Title | Minutes interim-2023-asdf-03: Wed 15:40 | |
State | Active | |
Other versions | markdown | |
Last updated | 2023-09-27 |
ASDF - AGENDA for September 27th 2023 virtual interim meeting
Info
Meeting: ASDF WG, 1540-1640 UTC, September 27, 2023
(Right after "CORE" WG)
Location:
https://meetecho-interims.ietf.org/conference/?short=cc9fb89c-9c7b-4a0b-85c0-1e9281066ba7
Chairs: Michael Richardson and Niklas Widell
Hedgedoc:
https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-interim-2023-asdf-03-asdf?edit
These notes at:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/asdf-working-group-notes.git
Agenda/Notes
Note Well https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/
Logistics for Meeting
Michael taking notes.
WG status update and planning (Chairs - 5 min)
WGLC started in early September (4th). Until 2023-09-20.
. o O ( all in Carsten's slides )
WGLC comments on SDF, preparation for sectoral review, shepherd write up
revision -15 was WGLC
received review by Christer Holmberg (very detailed review)
took perspective of new reader: found quite a few things.
Documents:
draft-ietf-asdf-sdf
Issues are in github repository:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/issues
get -16 done by monday oct. 2.
Ask for external reviews by Oct. 12.
We then get until Oct.23 (ID-cutoff) to finish, but get it in a few days
earlier than that (2023-10-19).
MK: Going to reach out to tap the OneDM community, who have not kept up.
AOB
Any other business?
proposed to have another virtual interim for Oct.25, at 9am Pacific
(1600 UTC)
Discuss our plans for the following non-WG documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search?name=asdf&sort=&rfcs=on&activedrafts=on
(all are listed on asdf document list now)
plus:
- Instances
- Protocol Bindings vs. Mapping Files
we will have rechartering discussion with AD at IETF118.
AK: for ecosystems that want to register quality name prefixes, they
have to do this with an RFC? (e.g.: OMA: ). There is a registry
("Quality Name Prefixes", Expert Review), and some additional
instructions.