Skip to main content

Bandwidth Constraints Models for Differentiated Services (Diffserv)-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering: Performance Evaluation
draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-06

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Allison Mankin
2005-01-05
06 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-06.txt
2005-01-03
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-12-31
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-12-31
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-12-31
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-12-28
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Bert Wijnen
2004-12-28
06 Bert Wijnen
New revision does include text (as suggested by Sec AD) and text (as suggested by TSV AD). Doc is ready for publication.

Pls do not …
New revision does include text (as suggested by Sec AD) and text (as suggested by TSV AD). Doc is ready for publication.

Pls do not the RFC_Editor note, requesting for an IESG disclaimer on the document.
2004-12-28
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-12-28 from 2004-11-30
2004-12-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-05.txt
2004-11-30
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot comment]
The author agreed that he will make the change - since it's an RFC Editor document,
I remove my Discuss before the revision.  …
[Ballot comment]
The author agreed that he will make the change - since it's an RFC Editor document,
I remove my Discuss before the revision.  (The change is to add material differentiating
DSTE from IP Diffserv:

>> There may be differences between the quality of service expressed and
>> obtained with Diffserv without DS-TE and with DS-TE.
>> Because DS-TE uses Constraint Based Routing, and because
>> of the type of admission control capabilities it adds to Diffserv,
>> DS-TE has capabilities for traffic that Diffserv does not:  Diffserv
>> does not indicate preemption, by intent, whereas DS-TE describes
>> multiple levels of preemption for its Class Types.  Also, Diffserv
>> does not support any means of explicitly controlling overbooking,
>> while DS-TE allows this.  When considering a complete quality of
>> service environment, with Diffserv routers and DS-TE, it
>> is important to consider these differences carefully.
2004-11-30
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] Position for Allison Mankin has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Allison Mankin
2004-11-30
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot comment]
The author agreed that he will make the change - since it's an RFC Editor document,
I remove my Discuss before the revision.
2004-11-30
06 Allison Mankin
[Ballot discuss]
This document has an introduction stating principles of diffserv and DSTE - it needs to make
clear the way that DSTE is very …
[Ballot discuss]
This document has an introduction stating principles of diffserv and DSTE - it needs to make
clear the way that DSTE is very distinct from diffserv by adding the following note to the
introduction:

>> There may be differences between the quality of service expressed and
>> obtained with Diffserv without DS-TE and with DS-TE.
>> Because DS-TE uses Constraint Based Routing, and because
>> of the type of admission control capabilities it adds to Diffserv,
>> DS-TE has capabilities for traffic that Diffserv does not:  Diffserv
>> does not indicate preemption, by intent, whereas DS-TE describes
>> multiple levels of preemption for its Class Types.  Also, Diffserv
>> does not support any means of explicitly controlling overbooking,
>> while DS-TE allows this.  When considering a complete quality of
>> service environment, with Diffserv routers and DS-TE, it
>> is important to consider these differences carefully.
2004-11-30
06 Bert Wijnen Agreement on additional text (note) to be added to address Allison's DISCUSS.
Text passed to author, copy to RFC-Ed.
2004-11-30
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-11-30 from 2004-11-25
2004-11-30
06 Bert Wijnen Agreement on additional text (note) to be added to address Allison's DISCUSS.
Text passed to author, copy to RFC-Ed.
2004-11-30
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-11-30 from 2004-11-25
2004-11-25
06 Bert Wijnen Checking with Allison what her DISCUSS text is
2004-11-25
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-11-25 from 2004-08-12
2004-10-21
06 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-08-12
06 Bert Wijnen
Informing RFC-Editor that this one is on hold because we have not yet approved the base documents, that is the various Bandwidth Constraint Models that …
Informing RFC-Editor that this one is on hold because we have not yet approved the base documents, that is the various Bandwidth Constraint Models that this document evaluates.
2004-08-12
06 Bert Wijnen State Change Notice email list have been change to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; wlai@att.com from
2004-08-12
06 Bert Wijnen Status date has been changed to 2004-08-12 from
2004-06-11
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10
2004-06-10
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-06-10
06 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2004-06-10
06 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-06-10
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot comment]
Reviewed by Spencer Dawkins, Gen-ART
2004-06-10
06 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-06-09
06 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-06-08
06 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-06-08
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Russ Housley
2004-06-08
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Reference [1] does not talk about the security ramifications of preemption.
  Therefore a paragraph on this topic ought to be added to …
[Ballot comment]
Reference [1] does not talk about the security ramifications of preemption.
  Therefore a paragraph on this topic ought to be added to section 10.
2004-06-08
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2004-06-07
06 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-06-10 by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen Ballot has been issued by Bert Wijnen
2004-06-03
06 Bert Wijnen Created "Approve" ballot
2004-06-03
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-06-03
06 (System) Last call text was added
2004-06-03
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-05-19
06 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova
2004-01-12
04 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-04.txt
2003-09-30
03 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-03.txt
2003-06-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-02.txt
2003-03-04
01 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-01.txt
2002-06-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-00.txt