Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Voiceband Data (VBD) Package and General-Purpose Media Descriptor Parameter Package
draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-10
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-12-05)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-12-02)
Unknown
I support Sean's discuss. I would like to clarify if (1) there is a mandatory to implement security mechanism, or (2) if it is mandatory to implement one of the two security mechanisms. Either (1) or (2) is okay, but I think it would be bad if the answer to both is "NO". Additional detail is definitely needed to have interoperable implementations using IPsec. I think additional information on SRTP is also required, but I could be wrong. :)