Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages
draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Siva Sivabalan , Jan Medved , Ina Minei , Edward Crabbe | ||
| Last updated | 2014-04-19 (Latest revision 2013-10-16) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type, draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
A Path Computation Element can compute traffic engineering paths (TE paths) through a network that are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are label switched paths (LSPs) which are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to PCEP to allow support for different path setup methods over a given PCEP session.
Authors
Siva Sivabalan
Jan Medved
Ina Minei
Edward Crabbe
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)