ForCES Protocol Evaluation Draft
draft-putzolu-forces-evaluation-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | David Putzolu | ||
| Last updated | 2003-10-27 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides an evaluation of the applicability of three proposed approaches for a ForCES protocol: FACT[2], GRMP[3], and Netlink2[4]. A summary of each of the proposed protocols against the ForCES requirements[5] and the ForCES framework[6] is provided. Compliancy of each of the protocols against each requirement is detailed. A conclusion summarizes how each of the protocols fares in the evaluation.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)