Skip to main content

Scenarios and Requirements for IP in Intelligent Transportation Systems
draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-00

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Authors Alexandre Petrescu , Christophe Janneteau , Witold Klaudel
Last updated 2012-07-09
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Additional resources
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-00
Network Working Group                                        A. Petrescu
Internet-Draft                                              C. Janneteau
Intended status: Informational                                       CEA
Expires: January 10, 2013                                     W. Klaudel
                                                                 Renault
                                                            July 9, 2012

Scenarios and Requirements for IP in Intelligent Transportation Systems
                draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-00.txt

Abstract

   This draft describes scenarios of vehicular communications that are
   considered pertinent to Intelligent Transportation Systems.  In these
   scenarios, the necessity of using IP networking technologies and
   protocols is exposed.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 10, 2013.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   3.  Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     3.1.  Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     3.2.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     3.3.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2V2I)  . . . . . . . 5
     3.4.  Infrastructure Support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   4.  Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Appendix A.  ChangeLog  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

1.  Introduction

   The field of vehicular communications is encompassing a large number
   of wired and wireless technologies.  In particular, the breakthrough
   advancements in wide-area cellular telecommunications, the advent of
   inexpensive hardware, impressively high bandwidth and low-cost data
   subscription plans make possible new paradigms which put the vehicle
   at the center of a communications ecosystem.  It can be observed that
   whereas only in the recent past linking vehicles in a robust manner
   to a fixed infrastructure represented endeavors available only to top
   categories, more and more middle category vehicles are announced to
   take advantage of data connectivity.

   Communication protocols used in the fixed and mobile (terminal)
   Internet can be applied in the scenarios employing vehicles which
   communicate.  A number of particular aspects make vehicular
   communications different, not least being the that mobility is the
   norm, rather than the exception.  At the same time, several protocols
   developped at IETF are good candidates to form basis of further
   development of IP protocols for vehicular communications.

   The use of Internet protocols in the vehicular scenarios may prove
   advantageous from several standpoints:

   o  immediate availability of a large number of applications with an
      established customer base.

   o  scalability: large numbers of inter-communicating vehicles can be
      accommodated across large distances.

   o  accessing heterogeneous, mixed and multiple-standard link layer
      technologies.

   The context of vehicular communications considers the use of several
   classes of Internet protocols for vehicular applications.  One
   particular family of protocols is Mobile IP.  Its salient features
   characterize well several mobility aspects such as reachability at
   permanent addresses, seamless handovers and group mobility
   management.  Earlier documents at IETF idenfitied a number of
   scenarios and potential requirements for further work towards
   improving the Mobile IP protocols for a better adaptation in
   vehicular environments (see for example the draft titled "Automotive
   Industry Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization" edited in 2009
   [I-D.ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req].)

   A Vehicle-to-Infrastructure scenario (V2I) is a typical setting in
   which a vehicle uses a long-range wireless interface (cellular,
   sattelite) to connect to a fixed infrastructure.  As a separate

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

   matter, scenarios of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications consider
   direct communications between vehicles, without, or with minimal,
   assistance from the infrastructure.  In areas where wireless coverage
   is absent, Vehicle-to-Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communications are
   scenarios where covered vehicles offer access to non covered
   vehicles, in a multi-hop manner.

2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

3.  Scenarios

3.1.  Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I)

   This section describes the communication scenario in which one mobile
   vehicle connects to a fixed infrastructure.

   Topology:

                --------             /--------------+
               | Vehicle|---     ---/Fixed          |------>Internet
                --------  wireless  \Infrastructure |
                            link     \--------------+
                        (long range)

    Figure 1: Topology for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure V2I Communications

3.2.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V)

   Topology:

                           --------             --------
                          | Vehicle|--       --| Vehicle|
                           --------  wireless   --------
                                       link
                                     (short range)

       Figure 2: Topology for Vehicle-to-Vehicle V2V Communications

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

3.3.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2V2I)

   Topology:

      --------             --------       /-------------+
     | Vehicle|--       --| Vehicle|-- --/Fixed         |----->Internet
      --------  wireless   --------  w   \Infrastructure|
                  link              link  \-------------+
               (short range)     (long range)

     Figure 3: Topology for Vehicle-to-Vehicle-to-Infrastructure V2V2I
                              Communications

3.4.  Infrastructure Support

4.  Requirements

   o  R0.  IP addressing within each vehicle.

   o  R1.  IP addressing on the interface between vehicles.

   o  Rn.

5.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to acknowledge colleagues who commented and
   thus helped improving this document.

6.  IANA Considerations

   No particular requirements to IANA.

7.  Security Considerations

   Currently no Security considerations.

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

8.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req]
              Baldessari, R., Ernst, T., Festag, A., and M. Lenardi,
              "Automotive Industry Requirements for NEMO Route
              Optimization", draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02
              (work in progress), January 2009.

Appendix A.  ChangeLog

   The changes are listed in reverse chronological order, most recent
   changes appearing at the top of the list.

   From -- to draft-petrescu-its-scenarios-reqs-00.txt:

   o  First version of draft issued.

Authors' Addresses

   Alexandru Petrescu
   CEA
   Communicating Systems Laboratory, Point Courrier 173
   Palaiseau,   F-91120
   France

   Phone: +33(0)169089223
   Email: alexandru.petrescu@cea.fr

   Christophe Janneteau
   CEA
   Communicating Systems Laboratory, Point Courrier 173
   Palaiseau,   F-91120
   France

   Phone: +33(0)169089182
   Email: christophe.janneteau@cea.fr

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft      Scenarios and Reqs for IP in ITS           July 2012

   Witold Klaudel
   Renault
   1 Av. du Golf
   Guyancourt,   F-78288
   France

   Phone: +33(0)176845680
   Email: witold.klaudel@renault.com

Petrescu, et al.        Expires January 10, 2013                [Page 7]