PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification Version 2.1
draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2017-01-24
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2016-11-12
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Closed request for Telechat review by GENART with state 'No Response' |
2016-10-28
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2016-10-27
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2016-09-20
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2016-09-20
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2016-09-20
|
04 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2016-09-20
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC |
2016-09-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2016-09-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2016-09-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2016-09-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-09-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-09-15
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2016-09-15
|
04 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2016-09-15
|
04 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2016-09-15
|
04 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2016-09-14
|
04 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Below is Bert Wijnen's OPS DIR review: I did OPSDIR review for this document. Such reviews are primarily intended to check if there … [Ballot comment] Below is Bert Wijnen's OPS DIR review: I did OPSDIR review for this document. Such reviews are primarily intended to check if there is any operational or network management impact. I do not see any such impact/aspects in the document, so I think the doc is ready for publication from this perspective. Some nits/questions: - Section: 5.2. PBKDFs should that be: 5.2. PBKDF2 ??? - I am somewhat surprised to see that ALL references are normative. even a reference to a slide deck: [WANG] X. Wang, A.C. Yao, and F. Yao. Cryptanalysis on SHA-1. Presented by Adi Shamir at the rump session of CRYPTO 2005. Slides may be found currently at |
2016-09-14
|
04 | Benoît Claise | Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise |
2016-09-14
|
04 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2016-09-14
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2016-09-14
|
04 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2016-09-13
|
04 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2016-09-12
|
04 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2016-09-09
|
04 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from Version Changed - Review Needed |
2016-09-08
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Fernando Gont |
2016-09-08
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Fernando Gont |
2016-09-06
|
04 | Andreas Rusch | New version available: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-04.txt |
2016-09-05
|
03 | Andreas Rusch | New version available: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-03.txt |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-09-15 |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot has been issued |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | Created "Approve" ballot |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | This follows the essay format described at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html The individual submission/AD sponsored document is an RFC'ized version of the original PKCS document and is presented … This follows the essay format described at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html The individual submission/AD sponsored document is an RFC'ized version of the original PKCS document and is presented for publication as an Informational RFC as part of the transfer of copyright from RSA/EMC to the IETF trust. We've done with with a bunch of other PKCS documents previously, e.g. RFC 7292, so there's no news here. Given the history of other PKCS series documents transferred to the IETF, publication as an Informational RFC is appropriate and the document is marked for proposed status as Informational. There are no IPR declarations needed. As sponsoring AD, in addition to IETF LC, I checked with the saag list that nobody had issues with this document. (There are a couple of ID-nits, which'll be fixed before or after the telechat.) |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2016-09-05
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | This follows the essay format described at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html The individual submission/AD sponsored document is an RFC'ized version of the original PKCS document and is presented … This follows the essay format described at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup.html The individual submission/AD sponsored document is an RFC'ized version of the original PKCS document and is presented for publication as an Informational RFC as part of the transfer of copyright from RSA/EMC to the IETF trust. We've done with with a bunch of other PKCS documents previously, e.g. RFC 7292, so there's no news here. Given the history of other PKCS series documents transferred to the IETF, publication as an Informational RFC is appropriate and the document is marked for proposed status as Informational. There are no IPR declarations needed. As sponsoring AD, in addition to IETF LC, I checked with the saag list that nobody had issues with this document. (There are a couple of ID-nits, which'll be fixed before or after the telechat.) The suggested document announcement is as follows: 'Technical Summary This document provides recommendations for the implementation of password-based cryptography, covering key derivation functions, encryption schemes, message-authentication schemes, and ASN.1 syntax identifying the techniques. 'Working Group Summary This is an individual submission being AD sponsored as a republication of PKCS #5 v2.1 [PKCS5_21] from RSA Laboratories' Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) series. By publishing this RFC, change control is transferred to the IETF. 'Document Quality This is a republication of a document from a well-respected and widely implemented series until now maintained by EMC/RSA. |
2016-09-02
|
02 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2016-09-01
|
02 | Andreas Rusch | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2016-09-01
|
02 | Andreas Rusch | New version available: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-02.txt |
2016-09-01
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Liang Xia. |
2016-08-24
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Bert Wijnen. |
2016-08-19
|
01 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2016-08-19
|
01 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-01.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this … (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-01.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, IANA does not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal IANA Specialist ICANN |
2016-08-11
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Fernando Gont |
2016-08-11
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Fernando Gont |
2016-08-11
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Liang Xia |
2016-08-11
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Liang Xia |
2016-08-08
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bert Wijnen |
2016-08-08
|
01 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Bert Wijnen |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (PKCS #5: … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification Version 2.1) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification Version 2.1' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-09-02. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document provides recommendations for the implementation of password-based cryptography, covering key derivation functions, encryption schemes, message-authentication schemes, and ASN.1 syntax identifying the techniques. The recommendations are intended for general application within computer and communications systems, and as such include a fair amount of flexibility. They are particularly intended for the protection of sensitive information such as private keys, as in PKCS #8. It is expected that application standards and implementation profiles based on these specifications may include additional constraints. Other cryptographic techniques based on passwords, such as password- based-key entity authentication and key establishment protocols are outside the scope of this document. Guidelines for the selection of passwords are also outside the scope. This document represents a republication of PKCS #5 v2.1 from RSA Laboratories' Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) series. By publishing this RFC, change control is transferred to the IETF. This document also obsoletes RFC 2898. Noting that in the abstract and some other ID-nits will be fixed during/after IETF last call. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Last call was requested |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Ballot writeup was generated |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was changed |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Last call announcement was generated |
2016-08-05
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2016-08-04
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Assigned to Security Area |
2016-08-04
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2016-08-04
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Intended Status changed to Informational from None |
2016-08-04
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Shepherding AD changed to Stephen Farrell |
2016-08-04
|
01 | Stephen Farrell | Stream changed to IETF from None |
2016-04-07
|
01 | Andreas Rusch | New version available: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-01.txt |
2016-02-03
|
00 | Michael Scott | New version available: draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-00.txt |