A Group Text Chat Purpose for Conference and Service URIs in the SIP Event Package for Conference State
draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-04
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -03)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -03)
Unknown
I would need someone more clueful than I to pronounce on this, but don't we have better things to include in an example than: <uri>http://sharepoint/salesgroup/</uri>
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -03)
Unknown
Did the *content* of this document get any review at all in the IETF? I know that DISPATCH looked at it, but that's a "where should this be handled" review rather than a content review. I see no discussion of it on the IETF list. Is this actually an IETF consensus document? (The general subject is a current topic of conversation between the IAB and IESG, so shedding some light on this case might prove useful. It should not stop publication of this document.)
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-11-29)
Unknown
Thanks for dealing with my discuss points.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -03)
Unknown
I did have one question, which you might consider along with any other comments you receive during the evaluation process. I'm reading (quickly) this specification plus RFC 4575 taken together as saying that a conference description with two grouptextchat purposes would be valid, so that a conference can advertise both an XMPP URI and an SIP URI with grouptextchat purpose, for instance. If that's valid, is there any expectation that if I type something into one of these group chats, it would show up for people in another chat advertised in the same conference description? You could also tell me that everyone uses XMPP for group chats, so this isn't an interesting question, of course :-)
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-20 for -03)
Unknown
I notice the following fragment in a couple of places: <subject>Agenda: This sprint's goals</subject> Given that Sprint is a service provider in this sector, it would be better to pick a neutral name.
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -03)
Unknown