Licklider Transmission Protocol - Security Extensions
draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions-08

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-11.txt 

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Licklider Transmission 
Protocol - Specification' <draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-11.txt> as an 
Experimental RFC. 

The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in 
the datatracker 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11799&rfc_flag=0) 
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit 
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot 
and the comment log. 

The IESG contact person is Russ Housley.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-11.txt


The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This series of three documents are about the Licklider Transmission
   Protocol developed in the DTNRG.

   <draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-10.txt>
      serves as the main protocol specification of LTP.

   <draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions-08.txt>
      defines two security extensions.

   <draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation-07.txt>
      provides motivation for the protocol.

Working Group Summary

   No IETF WG was involved. This protocol was developed in the IRTF.

Document Quality

   The document reached consensus in the DTNRG.

   The document was reviewed by Russ Housley for the IESG.

Personnel

   Kevin Fall <kfall@cs.berkeley.edu> is the document shepherd.

IESG Notes

For draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation-07.txt:

  This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard.
  It represents the consensus of the Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)
  Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF).  See
  RFC 3932 for more information.

For draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-10.txt:

  This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard.
  It represents the consensus of the Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)
  Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF).  It may
  be considered for standardization by the IETF in the future, but the
  IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any
  purpose and in particular notes that the decision to publish is not
  based on IETF review for such things as security, congestion control,
  or inappropriate interaction with deployed protocols.  See RFC 3932
  for more information.

For draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions-08.txt:

  This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard.
  It represents the consensus of the Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN)
  Research Group of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF).  It may
  be considered for standardization by the IETF in the future, but the
  IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any
  purpose and in particular notes that the decision to publish is not
  based on IETF review for such things as security, congestion control,
  or inappropriate interaction with deployed protocols.  See RFC 3932
  for more information.

RFC Editor Note